- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
超微分割放疗与常规放疗对脑胶质瘤细胞的作用比较-第三军医大学学报
低剂量超微分割与常规分割放疗对脑胶质瘤细胞的生物学效应比较
陈媛媛1,汤金梁1,龙海霞2,李光辉2,许建平1(400037重庆第三军医大学新桥医院:1病理科2肿瘤科)各时间点彗星荧光图像的尾部DNA百分含量(TailDNA%)、尾长(TailLength)、尾距(TailMoment)均数(P0.05)。流式检测细胞凋亡(P0.01)。2组细胞周期分布无显著差异。结论 低剂量率超微分割放疗对脑胶质瘤细胞GL261可产生与常规分割等效的DNA损伤,但对细胞的杀伤作用强于常规分割照射。该现象可能与低剂量率超微分割照射胶质瘤细胞后有不同的DNA损伤修复机制有关。
[关键词]脑胶质瘤;超微分割放疗;凋亡;DNA损伤李光辉,E-mail:liguanghui_2000@;许建平,电话:(023E-mail:xujianping33@
Comparision of biological effects between ultra-microfractionated radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy on glioma cells
Chen Yuanyuan1, Tang jinliang1, Long Haixia2, Li Guanghui2, Xu Jianping1 (1Department of Pathology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037; 2Department of Oncology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China)
[Abstract] Objective To compare ultra-microfractionated radiotherapy with conventional radiotherapy in effects on glioma cells. Methods The ultra-microfractionated radiotherapy (an interval of 3min for every 0.2Gy, the dose rate was 0.0667Gy/min) and conventional radiotherapy (the dose rate was 4-6Gy/min)were used to treat GL261 cells. On the 1st, 2nd and 3rd day after beginning of the treatment, the comet assay and flow cytometry were employed for detection of cell DNA damage, apoptosis and distribution of cell cycle. Results The comet assay showed that the ultra-microfractionated radiotherapy methods could cause similar cell DNA damage to the conventional one. The values comet TailDNA%, TailLength and TailMoment were not significantly different between the 2 groups (P 0.05) at different time phases. Flow cytometry showed that cell survival rate at different time phases was markedly lower in the ultra-microfractionated radiotherapy group than in the conventional radiotherapy group (P0.01). There were no remarkable differences in cell cycle distribution and growth curve between the 2 groups. Conclusion In glioma GL261 cells , ultra-microfractionated radiotherapy can cause similar cell DNA damage to
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 小学口算教学现状调查与对策探讨.docx
- 国家开放大学计算机应用基础(本) 终结性考试试题及参考答案.pdf
- 译林版英语七年级下单元知识点及语法归纳.doc VIP
- 沈北新区日处理量为35000m3d的市政污水处理厂工程设计.docx
- 2024年淮南省示范高中指标分配表 .pdf VIP
- 2024离婚起诉状 离婚起诉书(标准版).pdf
- 部编版小学语文四年级上册《王戎不取道旁李》教材分析.doc
- 近十年来150起较大及以上安全生产事故案例汇总A.pdf
- 2023年秋学期人教版初中历史九年级上册教学计划附教学进度表.pdf VIP
- 2022年山东开放大学公开招聘工作人员考试试题及答案.pdf VIP
文档评论(0)