由“红头文件”现状看行政规范性文件的监管.docVIP

学号： 0913124023 由“红头文件”现状 看行政规范性文件的监督和问责 学院名称： 法学院 专业名称： 法学 年级班别： 2009级2班 姓 名： 裴 棐 指导教师： 李伟敏 2013年4月 由“红头文件”现状看行政规范性文件的监管 摘要 行政规范性文件是是行政机关及被授权组织为实施法律和执行政策，在法定权限内制定的除行政法规和规章以外的决定、命令等普通性行为规范的总称，作为抽象行政行为的一种，行政规范性文件存在制定主体混乱、程序混乱、规范事项混乱等问题，极易侵犯行政相对人的合法权益，造成公权力的滥用，有悖于公平正义的法律理念，因而对于行政规范性文件的监督和管理至关重要，需要从各个层面对其制定和运行进行有效的控制，将行政规范性文件的制定纳入司法审查范畴，扩大行政诉讼的受理范围，在制定文件前注重民众意见，完善民众参与制度，构建“权力”——“权利”机制基于多种信息和交涉而获得的共识，无疑将是正当性的坚实基础，而正当性，又是规范性文件所必须具备的基本特征，正当性的缺失，直接意味着行政规范性文件整体的不合法性。因而行政规范性文件的合法律性和合民意性才是决定其存在的基本价值。 关键词 制定监督；司法审查；民众参与；事后问责 Administrative Normative Documents By the Status quo of Red Tape to see Regulation Abstract Administrative normative documents is the administrative organs and the authorized organization for the implementation of the law and implement policy, within the statutory limits beyond the administrative rules and regulations formulated by the decision, the floorboard of the normal sexual behavior norms such as command, as a kind of abstract administrative action, administrative normative documents exist for subject matters standard procedure chaos, chaos, confusion, problems such as easy to infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of administrative relative person, caused by the abuse of public power, contrary to the law of justice, which is vital for the supervision and management of administrative normative documents, need from all aspects of effective control of the formulation and operation of the administrative normative documents formulated into the category of judicial review, expand the administrative litigation jurisdiction, pays attention to public opinion before creating an documents, to perfect the public participation system, build the power, right mechanism based on a variety of information and representations for consensus, would be a solid foundati