- 1、本文档共19页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
国际经济学(多米尼克萨瓦尔多)课后答案.pdf
Salvatore’s Introduction to International Economics, 2nd Edition Instructor’s Manual
*CHAPTER 2
(Core Chapter)
COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE
ANSWERS TO REVIEW QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS
1. The mercantilists believed that the way for a nation to become rich and powerful was to
export more than it imported. The resulting export surplus would then be settled by an
inflow of gold and silver and the more gold and silver a nation had, the richer and more
powerful it was. Thus, the government had to do all in its power to stimulate the nation’s
exports and discourage and restrict imports. However, since all nations could not
simultaneously have an export surplus and the amount of gold and silver was fixed at any
particular point in time, one nation could gain only at the expense of other nations. The
mercantilists thus preached economic nationalism, believing that national interests were
basically in conflict.
Adam Smith, on the other hand, believed that free trade would make all nations
better off.
All of this is relevant today because many of the arguments made in favor of
restricting international trade to protect domestic jobs are very similar to the mercantilists
arguments made three or four centuries ago. That is why we can say that “mercantilism is
alive and well in the twenty-first century”. Thus we have to be prepared to answer and
demonstrate that these arguments are basically wrong.
2. According to Adam Smith, the basis for trade was absolute advantage, or one country being
more productive or efficient in the production of some commodities and other countries
be
文档评论(0)