打击虚假诉讼的刑罚手段不能缺位__省略_设立_诉讼欺诈罪_进行规制的探究_叶华杰.pdfVIP

第10 卷 第3 期 宁波广播电视大学学报 Vol. 10 No. 3 20 12 年9 月 JOURNAL OF NINGBO RADIO TV UNIVERSITY Sep .2012 63 打击虚假诉讼的刑罚手段不能缺位 ——对设立“诉讼欺诈罪”进行规制的探究 叶华杰，林恩伟 （温岭市人民法院，浙江温岭 317500） 【摘要】近年来，当事人通过虚构事实、隐瞒真相等各种手段提起民事诉讼已屡见不鲜，这种虚假、恶意的民事诉讼 行为不仅侵害了利害关系人的合法权益，还扰乱了正常的审判秩序，损害了司法的严肃性和权威性。本文通过对目前我 国虚假诉讼的现状及成因的分析，提出打击虚假诉讼刑罚手段不能缺位的观点，并通过与诈骗罪、妨害作证罪、帮助毁 灭、伪造证据罪等相关罪名的比较，对设立 “诉讼欺诈罪”的刑法规制进行探究。 【关键词】虚假诉讼；刑法规制；诈骗罪；妨害司法罪；诉讼欺诈罪 【中图分类号】D925 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1672-3724 （2012）03-0063-04 No Absence of Penalties against False Lawsuits ——on Establishment of Crime of Litigation Fraud YE Hua-j ie ，LIN En-wei （Wenling Peoples Court ，Wenling 3 17500 ，Zhej iang, China） Abstract: In recent years, it is not uncommon that people bring a civil action by various means of fictitious facts or concealing the truth, such false and malicious acts of civil litigation have not only seriously infringed upon the legitimate rights and interests of stakeholders, but also seriously disturbed the normal trial order, impaired the solemnity and authority of the administration of justice. In this paper, it makes an analysis of the status and causes of false litigation, and proposes that the penalties against false lawsuits cannot be absent, and also by comparing with other related charges including crime of fraud, prejudice to testify, and crime to help destroy and counterfeit evidence, it explores the optimal path for the introduction of the litigation fraud.