- 1、本文档共23页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
《《Legislative Bargaining and the Dynamics of Public Investment0a》.pdf
American Political Science Review Vol. 106, No. 2 May 2012
doi:10.1017/S0003055412000160
Legislative Bargaining and the Dynamics of Public Investment
MARCO BATTAGLINI Princeton University
SALVATORE NUNNARI and THOMAS R. PALFREY
California Institute of Technology
e present a legislative bargaining model of the provision of a durable public good over an
infinite horizon. In each period, there is a societal endowment that can either be invested in the
public good or consumed. We characterize the optimal public policy, defined by the time path
W
of investment and consumption. In a legislature representatives of each of n districts bargain over the
current period’s endowment for investment in the public good and transfers to each district. We analyze
the Markov perfect equilibrium under different voting q-rules where q is the number of yes votes required
for passage. We show that the efficiency of the public policy is increasing in q because higher q leads to
higher investment in the public good and less pork. We examine the theoretical equilibrium predictions by
conducting a laboratory experiment with five-person committees that compares three alternative voting
rules: unanimity (q = 5), majority (q = 3), and dictatorship (q = 1).
central role of government is the provision The debate on the policy consequences of differ-
Aof public goods to its citizenry. Most public ent voting rules has important practical implications,
goods provided by governments are durable, because we observe a large variety of voting rules in
and hence dynamic in nat
文档评论(0)