《WAS7_vs_WebLogic11》.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共16页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
《WAS7_vs_WebLogic11》.pdf

IBM Software March 2011 WebSphere IBM WebSphere Application Server v7 versus Oracle WebLogic 11g Competitive positioning 2 IBM WebSphere Application Server v7 versus Oracle WebLogic 11g This document covers key differences between Performance IBM® WebSphere® Application Server and Oracle WebLogic IBM has a long history of performance leadership with our Server. While both products are of high quality and will perform application server. Here are a few examples: well even in demanding mission-critical environments, there are still some differences in their efficiency and resulting total cost of ● In January 2010, IBM was the first vendor to publish for the ownership. In this document, we will briefly compare the follow- SPECjEnterprise2010 benchmark. It took Oracle more than ing capabilities: seven months to publish any result—and still they could not surpass IBM in per core performance, overall throughput/ ● Performance scalability and cost for performance. ● Administrative and management tools ● IBM continues to enhance performance: the new JPA ● License and support costs enhancements in the Feature Pack for Java® Persistence ● Licensing policies API 2.0 helped IBM increase its leading SPECjEnterprise2010 ● Virtualization and cloud support benchmark by 73 percent on a single server node. IBM has ● Standards support

文档评论(0)

wgvi + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档