《郑吉雄：评丘为君《戴震学的形成》》.pdf

臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 第2 卷第1 期 2005 年月6 月 頁197-213 Review Article 【書評論文】 評丘為君《戴震學的形成》 Review on Qiu Weijun’s Daizhenxue De Xingcheng 鄭吉雄∗ 關鍵詞 ：戴震、劉師培、章太炎、乾嘉、考證學 Keywords: Dai Zhen, Liu Shi-pei, Zhang Taiyan, qianjia, kaozhengxue ∗ 臺灣大學中國文學系教授。 198 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 2005 年 6 月 摘要 本文主要針對丘為君教授所撰寫的《戴震學的形成》所未討論到的三個重點， 提出補充。第一點是十八世紀以考據學為中心的知識論述的若干複雜性；第二點指 出晚清學者劉師培早已注意到戴震的重要性，對於戴震思想有所發揮，甚至影響了 章太炎。因此論戴震學的形成，不能不討論劉師培。第三點是日本學者研究戴震時， 不但早已注意到劉師培的重要性，也提出了若干中國學者未嘗注意的觀點，值得學 者參究。 Abstract This is a review as well as a supplementary note on Daizhenxue De Xingcheng by Professor Qiu Wei-jun, and three topics which were ignored by this book are discussed. First, the complexity of the “kaozhengxue” scholarship in the 18th century China is clarified before we discuss how the characteristic of Dai Zhen’s scholarship had an unusual impact on the scholars of the late 19th century. Second, when we talk about the beginning of the “Daizhenxue” (the study of Dai Zhen’s scholarship), Liu Shi-pei is a critical person that should be mentioned. Japanese scholar Professor Kawata Teiichi of Kansai University discussed the case of Liu in his research paper. Third, other Japanese scholars also suggested interesting and inspiring points of view in analyzing the spirit of Dai’s scholarship and the position of Dai in the intellectual history of the late imperial China. 199 評丘為君《戴震學的形成》 一、問題的提出 去年十一月某日與葛兆光教授（清華大學歷史系）在臺北聚會，言談 間談到丘為君教授的新著《戴震學的形成》。他向我表示，章太炎之前，劉 申叔（師培，1884-1919）已曾討論過戴東原。但該書以章為序幕，而沒有 講到劉，他為此頗感奇怪。這和我的