家庭装修水电工验收标准.pptVIP

  1. 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
家庭装修水电工验收标准

Metaphor theory in qualitative inquiry: A research journey Charlotte E. Rees Office of Postgraduate Medical Education, Sydney Medical School Presentation aims to: Demonstrate how a cognitive linguistics theory of metaphor informed the construction of post-hoc research questions How the theory informed the analysis of focus group data Discuss the strengths and challenges of employing theory-based analysis The research journey Patient involvement in medical education study (06/04-11/05) A priori RQ: What are the views and experiences of multiple stakeholders about patient involvement in medical education? Conducted 8 focus group discussions with medical students, medical educators (incl. doctors) and patients Conducted framework analysis to consider what participants said and how they said it (1) Important process-related theme identified was participants’ metaphoric talk… so what? Enter theory Cognitive linguistics theory of metaphor (2) Metaphors are ubiquitous in everyday talk (2) They structure our thinking and behavior (2) Understanding people’s metaphoric talk can reveal how they conceptualize themselves, their relationships with others and educational processes Conceptual metaphors Metaphor involves understanding an abstract domain (target) in terms of another, more concrete domain (source) e.g. ARGUMENT AS WAR (2) “Your claims are indefensible. He attacked every weak point in my argument… He shot down all my arguments (2, p. 4) How did the theory help? Theory helped us construct an original research question: What conceptual metaphors underpin stakeholders’ talk about student/doctor-patient relationships? Theory helped us determine how we should re-interogate our data: Systematic metaphor analysis (3) Systematic metaphor analysis (3) Determine target area for metaphor analysis (student, doctor, patient, S-P relationship, D-P relationship) Unsystematic collection of background metaphors (e.g. paternalism, consumerism etc.) Identify and code all MLEs p

文档评论(0)

6358999 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档