完善我国反行政垄断法律规则的若干思考.pdf

摘 要 行政垄断作为我国长期计划经济体制的产物，已成为我国市场经济发展的最 大障碍。我国《反垄断法》将反行政垄断作为其中的重要组成部分，为通过法律 手段规制行政垄断提供了一个新的契机，但我国《反垄断法》中有关反行政垄断 的规则尚有许多不足之处。论文对我国《反垄断法》有关行政垄断规制的相关制 度作了一个梳理，发现其中存在的问题；通过比较分析法和实证分析法，借鉴西 方国家成功的立法经验，对我国《反垄断法》有关反行政垄断的法律规则进行分 析，指出问题所在并提出完善的建议，期望最终能使《反垄断法》对行政垄断的 规制在实践中具有最大的操作性。 本文除引言、结束语外共分三个部分： 第一部分：通过从学理上分析行政垄断的构成要件的角度，指出我国《反垄 断法》定义的行政垄断的不妥之处，对行政垄断进行了重新定义。 第二部分：通过对反垄断执法机构的界定以及各国反垄断执法机构设置模式 的比较介绍，分析我国现行的“三足鼎立”格局存在的诸多缺陷。笔者认为，我 国应借鉴国外设立反垄断执行机构的经验，建立一个更加权威、独立的反垄断执 行机构。 第三部分：通过分析行政垄断法律责任自身应具有的特殊性，参考外国对行 政垄断法律责任制度的设计，笔者主张从行政责任、民事责任等方面完善我国的 行政垄断法律责任制度。 关键词：行政垄断；反行政垄断执法机构；行政垄断法律责任 I Abstract Administrative monopoly is an illegal action brought by our long-term planned economy and has long been the great problem of our market economic development. Our antitrust law includes the anti administrative monopoly as an important part of it. This is the new opportunity of anti administrative monopoly through legislation. But there are also many defects about the regulations of the anti administrative monopoly in our new antitrust law. The writer reviews roundly the relative regulations about the administrative monopoly in this new law and finds out the problems. The article is written by comparative and positive analysis and the legal experience of the foreign countries has been used for reference. It analysis the regulations about the anti administrative monopoly stated in the new law ,points out the defects among them and puts forward the suggestion to perfect them. The expectation can make the antitrust law have the greatest operation to the structure that the administration monopolizes in practice finally. This article is divided into three parts, excluding introduction and conclusion. The first part: Through the analysis of the constitutive requirements, it points out the concept of administrat