Financing California’s strongInfrastructurestrong - Sacramento State.pdf

Financing California’s strongInfrastructurestrong - Sacramento State.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共40页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Financing California’s Infrastructure Sponsored by the CSU Faculty Research Fellows Program Michael Semler Government Department Sacramento State University December 2005 Executive Summary California’s infrastructure, including schools, hospitals, highways, water and sewage systems, jails and prisons, have been built over the past fifty years using a myriad of financing strategies. Initially these facilities were paid using current revenues (paying-as-you go), but as projects became larger and more expensive, and state and local governments had to allocate revenues for other purposes, a shift occurred to the use of bonds (borrowing). The use of bonds allows public agencies to complete projects more rapidly and have future residents, who will benefit from the completed project, contribute to the cost. Since 1958, California voters have authorized the sale of $83 billion worth of General Obligation (GO) bonds; sixty percent of these bonds went to construct and modernize higher education and K -12 classrooms and buildings. Additionally, the State has $11 billion in lease-revenue bonds outstanding and currently authorized. As of October 1, 2005, California had outstanding $34.5 billion of General Fund supported GO bonds, exclusive of $10.7 Economic Recovery bonds, and another $30.5 billion authorized and yet to be sold. . This year repayments of these debts use approximately 4.5% of the General Fund. In five years, according the Legislative Analyst’s 2005 Fiscal Forecast, debt service will rise to 5.2%. Investors and credit agencies consider as moderate a range of debt service capacity as between 6% to 8%, but they argue against inserting any specific debt limit into law or constitutions as too restrictive. Creditors want governments to have flexibility in their abi

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档