Governing the moral strongeconomystrong animal engineering, ethics and.pdf

Governing the moral strongeconomystrong animal engineering, ethics and.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共31页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Governing the moral economy: animal engineering, ethics and the liberal government of science Alison Harvey Centre for Biomedicine and Society Brian Salter Department of Political Economy This paper forms part of the work of the Wellcome LABTEC Centre at King’s College London King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS 1 Abstract The preferred Western model for science governance has come to involve attending to the perspectives of the public. In practice, however, this model has been criticised for failing to promote democracy along participatory lines. We argue that contemporary approaches to science policy making demonstrate less the failure of democracy and more the success of liberal modes of government in adapting to meet new governance challenges. Using a case study of UK policy debates on scientific work mixing human and animal biological material, we show first how a ‘moral economy’ is brought into being as a regulatory domain and second how this domain is governed to align cultural with scientific values. Through these practices, the enhancement of individual and collective prosperity through technological advance is ensured. Keywords: Science governance, bioethics, liberalism, moral economy, human/animal mixing 2 Science is too important to be left only to scientists. Their knowledge, an

文档评论(0)

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档