- 1、本文档共61页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
lecture4 public goods.ppt
Suppose that in response to government giving grants to local medical research projects, you reduce your annual gift. ??This is an example of which of the following problems with the public provision of a public good? a. ?measuring preferences for the public goodb. ?crowding-out of private provisionc. ?measuring the costs and benefits of public goodsd. ?all of the abovee. ??both a and c * * Which of the following MUST be true? a. ?Government provision of a public good will perfectly crowd-out private contributions.b. ?The private market will overcome the free rider problem.c. ?Government provision of a public good will at least partially crowd out private contributions. d. ?Both b and c are correct.e. ?None of the above is correct. * * Which of the following refers to the idea that even if individuals are willing to tell government how much theyre willing to pay for a public good, they may not have an idea of what that is? a. ?preference revelationb. ?preference aggregationc. ?preference knowledged. ?warm-glow effecte. ?altruism * * Suppose that the city manager says that everyone lied about how much he or she would value a proposed city project. ?This is an example of which of the following? a. ?preference revelationb. ?altruismc. ?preference knowledged. ?warm-glow effecte. ?preference aggregation * * Taxing noncontributors to finance the provision of a public good will lead to which of the following? a. ?more accurate preference revelationb. ?altruismc. ?increased crowding-out of private provisiond. ?decreased crowding-out of private provisione. ?easier preference aggregation * * 必读教材 李齐云总编《财政学》,高教出版社 参考资料 Jonathan Gruber,Public Finance and Public Policy,MIT,2007. Harvey Rosen, Public Finance(中译本) * * * * * 1st click - “Private goods” 2nd click - “Public goods” 3rd click - “Common resources” 4th click - “Natural monopoly” 私人部门的供给不足 由于假定两个人偏好相同: 回忆:边际效用递减 在这个例子中,社会最优供给要求烟花消费的边际效用等于冰激凌消费边际效用的一半。 那么,分散的个体理性导致每个人消费过多的冰激凌(私人品),过少的
文档评论(0)