网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共17页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

CACV 366/2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL APPEAL NO. 366 OF 2007 (ON APPEAL FROM HCA NO. 1250 OF 2006) ---------------------------- BETWEEN CHAK KAK 1st Plaintiff YUEN WAI CHUNG 2nd Plaintiff LAI KAM ON 3rd Plaintiff CHOI CHI HANG 4th Plaintiff NGAI WAI YUK, ALICE 5th Plaintiff and PACRIM INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL INC. Defendant ------------------------ Before: Hon , Cheung JA and Chu J in Date of Hearing: 23 May 2008 Date of : 4 June 2008 _______________ _______________ : Introduction The defendant is a company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. This is the plaintiffs’ claim against the defendant for, inter alia, CN$60,000 said to be payable by the defendant on the redemption of the 60,000 convertible preference shares (“CP shares”) of CN$1.00 each in the defendant held by each of the plaintiffs. Notices of the redemption had been issued by the defendant on 27 October 2003, stating that the CP shares were being redeemed at a value of CN$0.01 per share. According to the defendant, they had received in August 2003 an independent valuation of the CP shares from Global Merger Acquisition Finance Inc which assessed their value as “nominal from a financial point of view”. Yam J, after trial, decided in favour of the plaintiffs. This is the defendant’s appeal. Background The facts are not very clear. But I think I can proceed on the basis that in about 1992, each of the plaintiff invested CN$150,000 in order to qualify for emigration to Canada. If the investment had prospered they would have received CN$160,000 pursuant to a Promissory Note issued to them by the First Mortgage Nova Scotia Fund Inc (“the Funds”). As of about June 1997, each of them had received a first instalment of CN$50,000. In the meantime, as was explained in the Funds’ letter to note holders dated 10 June 1997 (“the letter”), because the investment was made under the investment program which was designed to create jobs and ben

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

qiaogao + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档