网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

AO长骨骨折分型重点详解.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共31页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
骨干骨折 B 型骨折:粉碎的楔形骨折 B 型骨折的分组: B1 = 螺旋 楔形 B2 = 屈曲 楔形 B3 = 多段 楔形 骨干骨折 C 型骨折:粉碎的复杂骨折 C 骨折的分组: C1 = 复杂,螺旋形 C2 = 复杂,节段 C3 = 复杂,不规则 骨骺端/干骺端骨折 这是节段 1 和 3 的骨折 谨记: A = 关节外 B = 部分关节内 C = 完全关节内 骨骺端/干骺端骨折 A1 = 干骺端 简单 A2 = 干骺端 楔形 A3 = 干骺端 复杂 A1 A2 A3 骨骺端/干骺端骨折 B1 = 外髁,矢状面 B2 = 内髁,矢状面 B3 = 额状面骨折 B1 B2 B3 骨骺端/干骺端骨折 C1 = 关节内和干骺端均为简单 C2 = 关节内简单,干骺端粉碎 C3 = 关节内和干骺端均为粉碎 C1 C2 C3 踝关节骨折 44- 44-A =下胫腓联合水平以下 腓骨骨折 44-B =下胫腓联合水平 腓骨骨折 44-C =下胫腓联合水平以上 腓骨骨折 A B C 44 肱骨近端骨折 A B C 肱骨近端 11- 11-A 关节外单处骨折 11-B 关节外两处骨折 11-C 关节内骨折 股骨近端骨折 A B C 股骨近端骨折 31- 31-A 粗隆间骨折 31-B 股骨颈骨折 31-C 股骨头骨折 病例 33-C3 分型? 骨 = 3 节段 = 3 类型 = C 组 = 3 病例 32-A3 类型 = A 组 = 3 (屈曲骨折, 30°) 分型? 骨 = 3 节段 = 2 小结 AO 骨折分型 是: - 能充分理解的(comprehensive) - 适用的(adaptable) - 一致的(consistent) - 动态的(dynamic) 依赖于骨科医生正确评估骨折类型的能力 * “The basis of all clinical activity, be it: - assessment and treatment, - investigation and evaluation, - learning and teaching, must be based upon sound data, properly assembled, clearly expressed, and readily accessible”. W. M. Murphy and D. Leu Soon after ORIF (open reduction and internal fixation) became “acceptable” treatment for certain fractures, the AO group recognized: - the need for “sound data”, - to assess the efficacy and risks of what was then very aggressive methods of fracture management The AO group: - set out to document all fractures being treated by its members Rapidly it became apparent: - as the volume of information built up, - that a means of codifying this information was necessary, - so that data could readily be added and extracted, This process stimulated the development of the comprehensive classification of fractures. During the 1960s–70s: - almost every fracture had a classification system of its own, which was of value in management of fractures However, these classifications: - were groupings, - usually free-standing, - uncoordinated, - and proved to be quite unhelpful for comparing the outcomes of

文档评论(0)

我是兰花草 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档