司法构造：超越民事诉讼【外文翻译】.doc

外文翻译Springer New York,?2008:257-272 原文： Constructs of Justice: Beyond Civil Litigation Of：Alan J. Tomkins and Kimberly ApplequistIt is the case that civil justice problems constitute the bulk of courts’ work in both the state and federal legal systems (see, e.g., Court Statistics Project, 2006;U.S. Courts, 2007). Nevertheless, a decision rendered by a jury (or a judge) takes place in only a relatively small percentage of civil disputes. There are exponentially more civil disputes resolved outside of court than are resolved via jury verdicts (see,e.g.,Galanter, 1983, 1993, 1996; Miller Sarat, 1980?1981; Trubek, Grossman, Felstiner, Kritzer, Sarat, 1983), a state of affairs true for the UK as well as the US (Pleasence, 2006). Hersch?s (2006) analysis of nearly 3,800 federal civil cases shows even a litigant?s request for a jury trial rather than a bench trial (regardless of whether it emanates from the plaintiff or the defendant) in trial-eligible cases is more likely to result in the parties? out-of-court settlement than it is to result in a jury verdict. The empirical reality, thus, is that juries play only a limited?it is fair to say,a relatively minor?role in civil dispute resolution. Yet jury research has dominated the scholarship of the psychology and law community virtually since therevival of psych -olegal research in the 1970s, and the pattern of focusing on jury matters continu es today. This chapter is a call for psycholegal scholars to study civil justice matters beyo -nd the context of litigation and the courts, both to allow us to better understand the resolution of civil issues in the litigation/court contexts and to better understand the larger institutional (and sometimes societal) contexts in which civil disputes materialize and are most often resolved (see Felstiner, Abel, Sarat, 1980?1981; Galanter, 1983, 1993, 1996; Kritzer, Vidmar, Bogart, 1991; Trubek et al., 1984; Trubek, Sarat, Felstiner, Kritzer, Grossman,1983). An area of psycholegal