Race,EthnicityandResidentialIntermixinginUSMSAs.pptVIP

Map of 49 Metropolitan Areas Major Patterns of Residential Intermixing Diversity Intermixing - View of Regional Spatial Variation Interesting Patterns Micro-level Analyses – 3 MSAs in Ohio Variables and Entropy Indices Correlation Values for Diversity Score (Among Minorities) for MSAs Correlation Values for Diversity Score (Among Minorities) for MSAs Backward Step-Wise Regression 14 Variables initially; Chosen from original 51 on basis of -- Strength of zero-order r; (ii) Intercorrelations among candidate variables (threshold of 0.60) (iii) Relevance in terms of Explanatory Frameworks and Research Criteria: F value of 0.05 for Entry; 0.06 for Removal Correlation among Independent Variables Diversity Score (Minorities-Among-Themselves) and African American Portion of MSA Population (2000) = -0.61 Change in Population (1980-2000, Percent) and Population who Lived in Different House in 1995 (Percent) = +0.68 Houses Built Between 1990-2000 as Percent of 2000 Stock = +0.61 Change in Foreign-Born Population, 1990-2000 (Percent) and Foreign-Born Entered 1980-2000 as Percent Total F-B = +0.81 Houses Built Between 1990-2000 as Percent of 2000 Stock = +0.80 Population who Lived in Different House in 1995 (Percent) and Houses Built Between 1990-2000 as Percent of 2000 Stock = +0.84 Foreign-Born Entered 1980-2000 as Percent Total F-B = +0.60 Foreign-Born Entered 1980-2000 as Percent Total F-B and Houses Built Between 1990-2000 as Percent of 2000 Stock = +0.62 In Short – Great Deal of Interrelationship between Diversity Score (Minorities-Among-Themselves) African American Portion of MSA Population (2000) Change in Population (1980-2000, Percent) Population who Lived in Different House in 1995 (Percent) Houses Built Between 1990-2000 as Percent of 2000 Stock Change in Foreign-Born Population, 1990-2000 (Percent) Foreign-Born Entered 1980-2000 as Percent Total F-B Hence, Population Change Overall and Dynamics rela