- 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
goodchildgeoinformatics2009--TheChangingFaceofGIS
4. Scale Level of detail the inevitability of generalization Extent generalizability of results Methods of upscaling, downscaling Fractal concepts Scale is always important many properties cannot be defined independently of scale length of a coastline slope of a topographic surface land use class “the flattest spot in the US” Summary Working with spatial data is not always simple and intuitive but it can yield great insights if handled appropriately There is a substantial body of knowledge that needs to be acquired by anyone working with spatial data you would never think of doing a t test without taking a course in statistics why would you consider using a GIS without taking a course in spatial thinking? Conclusions Web 2.0 is creating novel sources of geospatial information that can complement traditional sources that can play a key role in time-critical situations It is possible to enumerate the fundamental concepts of a spatial approach four broadly defined concepts 27 in De Smith, Goodchild, and Longley (2006) Geospatial Analysis 177 in ontology Conclusions (2) Critical spatial thinking is more than GIS an enveloping conceptual framework for many new technologies and disciplines phenomena embedded in space and time many drivers One of a minimal set of intelligences part of everyone’s education Why bother to analyze it?... So, why semantic service discovery have a look on this map that appeared in the Economist in May 2003 is to illustrate the threat caused by North Korean Missiles with different ranges (1300 – 15000 km) there‘s a mistake in this map - can anybody spot it? Show you the correct result, which differs significantly reason is that you always have to use a projection to display the earth‘s surface on a flat piece of paper and in projections one cannot simply draw circles to create buffers, especially when dealing with big distances The Changing Face of GIS Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara * Two topics New data sources
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 曼隆电梯MEP电气原理图.pdf VIP
- 防治荒漠化公约-unitednationsconventiontocombatdesertification.pdf VIP
- 苏教版4年级上册数学试卷.doc VIP
- 曼隆电梯MEP原理图NICE3000电气原理图纸SDA7700B.pdf
- 通风与空调工程专项施工方案(最全).doc VIP
- 色素痣诊疗专家共识(2025版)解读 PPT课件.pptx VIP
- 小学英语语法课件- 一般将来时 (共36张PPT) 全国通用.ppt VIP
- 个人简历模板表格求职简历模板表格.docx VIP
- 血管炎肾损害.ppt VIP
- COC七版半自动人物卡v2.0.4(通用).xlsx VIP
文档评论(0)