网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

goodchildgeoinformatics2009--TheChangingFaceofGIS.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
goodchildgeoinformatics2009--TheChangingFaceofGIS

4. Scale Level of detail the inevitability of generalization Extent generalizability of results Methods of upscaling, downscaling Fractal concepts Scale is always important many properties cannot be defined independently of scale length of a coastline slope of a topographic surface land use class “the flattest spot in the US” Summary Working with spatial data is not always simple and intuitive but it can yield great insights if handled appropriately There is a substantial body of knowledge that needs to be acquired by anyone working with spatial data you would never think of doing a t test without taking a course in statistics why would you consider using a GIS without taking a course in spatial thinking? Conclusions Web 2.0 is creating novel sources of geospatial information that can complement traditional sources that can play a key role in time-critical situations It is possible to enumerate the fundamental concepts of a spatial approach four broadly defined concepts 27 in De Smith, Goodchild, and Longley (2006) Geospatial Analysis 177 in ontology Conclusions (2) Critical spatial thinking is more than GIS an enveloping conceptual framework for many new technologies and disciplines phenomena embedded in space and time many drivers One of a minimal set of intelligences part of everyone’s education Why bother to analyze it?... So, why semantic service discovery have a look on this map that appeared in the Economist in May 2003 is to illustrate the threat caused by North Korean Missiles with different ranges (1300 – 15000 km) there‘s a mistake in this map - can anybody spot it? Show you the correct result, which differs significantly reason is that you always have to use a projection to display the earth‘s surface on a flat piece of paper and in projections one cannot simply draw circles to create buffers, especially when dealing with big distances The Changing Face of GIS Michael F. Goodchild University of California Santa Barbara * Two topics New data sources

文档评论(0)

zilaiye + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档