网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

2BasicTermsandtenetsofCxG构式语法1学案.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共55页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2 Basic Terms Tenets of CxG Lead-in Overview: basic unit for linguistic analysis, emergence of CxG and its criticism. Indicate: 1) solid roots in cognitively oriented linguistic analysis 2) consistent fundamental interest contents Definition A long history: Stoics (斯多葛学派 336-264 BC) : Zeno Modistae(摩迪斯泰学派13th century): speculative grammarians Traditional grammarians have found Cxn useful to refer to properties of particular constructions. In the sense of “formulaic, fixed sequences” modern linguistics: Saussure, Bloomfield, Chomsky, etc. Saussure(1916):构式视为“词语在句法层面上的组合性联接”。 Bloomfield(1933):“凡是两个(或者两个以上,不过这种情况很少有)形式组合在一起作为一个复合形式的成分,联结这些形式的语法特征就构成了一个构式”。 Chomsky( 1991): 构式是一种可从普遍原则推导出来的“附带现象”,构式和词汇一样具有异质性,因而被排除在主要研究对象之外。 In standard generative theory, rules of grammar create word combinations that express composite concepts, but these rules do not add any meaning to that contributed by the individual word. Simply speaking, phrases have meaning but the rules that create phrases do not!!! TG’ evolution has tended to move further away from construction-specific proposals toward a discussion focused almost exclusively on general principles from which the idiosyncrasies of individual constructions are supposed to be derived. (Ginzburg and Sag 2004, Goldberg 1995) Chomsky(1993): “普遍语法(UG)”是一个抽象、自主的形式系统,为语言提供了一套固定的规则和有限的参数,将参数代入原则就能形成具体语言的表达特征,从而消解了语法构式及其特有的规则。 TG理论的登场彻底导致语言学家抛弃了中世纪将结构视为有意义的语言现象的传统观点,认为只有词汇才有意义,而句法仅提供组合词汇的规则,本身没有意义,以此满足纯形式化演算的需要。 Challenges from CL, interest in construction CxG’s Reflection Innateness Universalism Autonomy Modularity Dualism Formalism Basic Views Lakoff 1977:Gestalt Grammar Constructions are seen as linguistic gestalt. 1987: Construction Constructions are in general holistic, that the meaning of the whole construction is motivated by the meaning of the parts, but is not computable from them. Note: against Reductionism or

文档评论(0)

知识宝库 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档