- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
基于Bayes理论的计算机辅助诊断系统在孤立性肺
基于Bayes理论的计算机辅助诊断系统在孤立性肺结节CT诊断中的应用
陈伟 刘进康 李文政 熊曾 龙学颖 周晖 (中南大学湘雅医院放射科,湖南长沙410008)
摘要: 目的 初步探讨基于Bayes理论的计算机辅助诊断(computer-aided diagnosis, CAD)系统在孤立性肺结节(solitary pulmonary nodule, SPN)Application of Bayesian theory based computer-aided diagnosis system in the CT diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules
CHEN Wei, LIU Jin-kang, LI Wen-zheng, XIONG Zeng, LONG Xue-ying, ZHOU Hui. (Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China)
Abstract Objective To preliminarily explore the value of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)system based on Bayesian theory in the diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) with CT. Methods Three hundred and fifty-two consecutive SPN cases (malignancy n=135, benignity n=217) were collected retrospectively to form the training set. According to Bayesian theory, the prior odds of malignant SPNs and the likelihood ratios of clinical and CT findings were derived from the training set firstly, then a Bayesian theory based CAD system was constructed and the probability of malignancy in each SPN was obtained from this system. SPs with ≥50% calculated probability were judged as malignancy and those with 50% calculated probability was judged as benignity. On the test set (malignancy n=61, benignity n=71), the Bayesian theory based CAD system was tested prospectively for its diagnostic validation, compared with the performance of the two chest radiologists and two radiologic residents using routine diagnostic method. Results The Bayesian theory based CAD system was constructed successfully. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy of this system for the training set were 88.9%, 93.1%, 91.5% respectively. On the test set, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of this system were 88.5%, 85.9%, 87.1%, 84.4% and 89.7% respectively, its accuracy showed no statistically significant with chest radiologist A (80.3%, χ2=2.37, P=0.122) and B (79.5%,χ2=3.12, P=0.076),
文档评论(0)