- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Passive roary dynamic sitting at the workplace by office
CONSORT 清单评价RCT论文
论文
部分 条 目 内 容 评 价 VAS 文题
摘要 1a 文题能识别是随机临床试验 Passive rotary dynamic sitting at the workplace by office-workers
with lumbar pain: a randomized multicenter study 是 1b 结构式摘要,包括试验设计、方法、结果、结论几个部分 BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It is generally recognized that long periods of sitting can either
cause or aggravate lumbar pain. A new, ergonomically designed chair has a fixed backrest and a
motor-driven seat with a horizontal rotary movement in alternating left-right cycles.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to prove superiority of the new technique of passive ro-tary dynamic sitting for subjects working in a sedentary occupation and suffering from lumbar pain.
STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, two-armed study was
performed using a parallel group design.
PATIENT SAMPLE: 280 persons suffering from lumbar pain were matched pairwise and ran-domized en bloc.
OUTCOME MEASURES: The first and second primary endpoints target criteria were the vali-dated German version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the number of days of absence
from work (DA) attributable to lumbar pain, each based on a blinded 2-year follow-up observation
after randomization of the subjects.
METHODS:After inclusion in the study anonymization, the probands were randomized to receive
either an office chair with a motor-driven seat performing a horizontal rotary movement or a chair
of the same design without the rotary seat movement. Before delivery of the chairs, 23 probands
(8.2%) withdrew their consent to inclusion in the study without stating reasons. From 12 of the re-maining matching partners, 23 new pairs were created at random, and the study commenced with
124 pairs.
RESULTS: A further 27 probands (9.6%) were lost to follow-up during the period up to the final
consultation. This made it possible to observe the primary endpoint in 82.5% of the probands. The
median ODI in both groups was 53 (95% confidence interval for median difference: 1.5 to 0.5;
p
文档评论(0)