Science,faith,andreason.pptVIP

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Science, faith, and reason Religion: a system of beliefs and practices primarily centered around a transcendent Reality, either personal or impersonal, which provides ultimate meaning and purpose to life Science: the exploration, description, explanation, and prediction of occurrences in the natural world which can be checked and supported by empirical evidence Conflict, independence, or integration? Science and religion are in conflict with each other View points Scriptural literalists Scientific materialists Challenges Scripture is not a scientific textbook. Scientific method cannot verify itself Science and religion are completely independent forms of thought and practice which never come into contact View points Protestant neo-orthodoxy Linguistic analysis Problems Religious engagement Disparate domains Science and religion are integrated in some way. Versions Natural theology Systematic synthesis Positives Single unified worldview, without discrediting science or religion Exciting new prospects Rational validation views of faith and reason Non-evidential views of faith and reason Fideism Kierkegaard Evidence not needed The “leap of faith” “The will to believe” James Deciding between hypotheses Believing even if evidence is lacking Pascal’s wager: believing in God is a better bet than not believing Reformed epistemology Plantinga Belief in God can still be rational, even without evidence Contradicts foundationalism Belief in god is properly basic Basic, but not groundless Which of the three views of the relationship between religion and science do you find to be most accurate given the ways religion and science are generally understood and practiced today? First characterize the view and then explain why you believe it to be so Evolution and creationism are often considered to be diametrically opposed beliefs about the existence and development of flora and fauna. Can they be reconciled? Are faith and reason mutually exclusive concepts? Can you hav

文档评论(0)

suijiazhuang2 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档