从审稿人角度谈如何发表高质量的学术论文.doc

从审稿人角度谈如何发表高质量的学术论文-dmfang@paper本文是在帖子“我的发表学术论文心得和建议：与水友聊天实录。-dmfang@paper”基础上整理，并增补了一些写作方面的内容。dmfang@paper 2007.11.26 22：00从审稿人角度谈如何发表高质量的学术论文我觉得作为投稿的作者，知道或者了解该期刊对审稿人的审稿要求很重要，只有了解期刊对审稿人的审稿要求，你才知道自己的文章是否合适投稿到或者发表到该期刊。当然，每个期刊的审稿要求或许不一样，而且每个审稿人审稿时把握的尺寸或者审稿重点也许不一样，但是，作为严谨的学术论文发表，大多期刊对学术论文都有起码的要求，这个要求就体现在期刊如何要求审稿人审稿的或者说对投稿稿件的要求。笔者读博三年期间有幸审稿过四篇本领域国外高质量期刊的投稿文章，三篇IEEE的，一个letter，两个trans期刊，另外一篇Elsevier的Microelectronic engineering。下面就举几个我审过稿的期刊对审稿在审稿时的要求。请大家仔细看这些期刊对稿件的要求。IEEE Electrochemical and Solid-State Letters要求审稿人从下面几个因素考虑文章：In particular, the review form will rapidly allow you to provide feedback on the items of interest: Quality and significance of the Article Clarity of Presentation Suitability for Letters Clarity of Figures and Tables (Is color essential?) Understandable to Non-Specialists? Does Material Need to Be Added or Deleted? Recommendation Do You Want to See the Revised Manuscript? IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies审稿要求：Paper Quality ： Originality of the Work ： Significance of the Work ： Completeness of the Report Work ： Reference of the Work of Others ： Organization of the Manuscript ： Clarity in Writing, Tables, Graphs and Figures :每项有五个等级：Poor Marginal Acceptable Good Prize Microelectronic engineering期刊的审稿方式是打分，没有具体到各项，最后有个总评（General Commentary）：。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。Accept without modification : Request modifications : (Complete Sections B and C of report form)Reject : (Complete Section D of report form)___________________________________________________________________Judgement of Paper: (Use scale of 1-10. 1 = Poor, 5 = Marginal,8 = Good, 10 - Exceptional )General Commentary:。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。在网上可以搜到的一些审稿要求，比如APL的：RECOMMENDATION: Paper Interesting: Original Paper: Sufficient Physics: Well Organized and Clear: Free From Errors: Conclusions Supported: Appropriate Title: Good Abstract: Satisfactory English: Adequate References: Clear Figures: OVERALL RAT