- 1、本文档共37页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
辩论赛技巧常用句子 bianlun
导读:就爱阅读网友为您分享以下“bianlun”资讯,希望对您有所帮助,感谢您对92的支持!
Debate in My View
Debate, in my point of view, refers to the process of explaining ones’ own views on things or issues and convincing others with certain reasons. And also,to expose the conflict and incorrectness of the other side, so that the final common understanding can be reached.
Three elements needed in a debate. First of all,there need to be different opinions between the two parties in the debate. It is essential for the two parties to have different views in order to achieve ideological confrontation. One cannot argue with one’s own, and the tradeoff and comparison of several schemes or practices in one’s own mind is called thinking rather than debate.Secondly, the debate must be directed at the same thing or the same problem, that is to say, a certain same topic is needed in a debate. If the two parties are talking about different topics, they can not realize the significance of the debate. For example, a person said, “the law has a class neture”, while another person said, “the market economy is the legal economy”. For these two people know the object is different, these two point of views can not constitute a debate. Only when a person says that “the law has a class nature”, and another person says that “the law doesn’t has a class nature.” These two judgments will form a debate. Because the two judgments are on the same object, and also are the ideas of mutual antagonism, and these two judgments at most can only have one for the truth. So there is a problem must be debated for which is right and which is wrong. The third one is that two parties of the debate must have, more or less,common understanding and common recognition of the premise, such as the identity of thinking and the law of contradiction and the law of excluded middle and the law of sufficient reason,as well as socialjustice,authenticity standard and value orientation. Without these things, the debate would be a m
文档评论(0)