网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

阅读理解解题技法示范(二)报告.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共38页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
阅读理解解题技法示范(二)报告

69.在作者看来,下列哪一项正确? (1)通过题干和选项确定题目类型,定位信息源 ①题型判定: ②信息定位:由选项中的“spoilt”可定位信息源为文章的 细节理解题 第三段第一句 选项译文 文中表述 比对结果 A 我们应该复制一些同样的古建筑。 B 建筑不应影响它们周围的环境。 C 一些古建筑已破坏了它们所在的地区。 D 没人理解为何有人反对新建筑。 文章最后一句,作者不同意复制古建筑。 曲解文意 第二段第三句,只要建筑招人喜欢且不太影响周围的环境即可。 曲解文意 由第三段第一句可知,一些新、老建筑都会破坏它们所在的地区。 合理推断 (正确选项) 第三段最后两句,仍有人反对新建筑是因为他们思想保守,不愿改变。 颠倒是非 (2)将选项与原文信息比对,确定答案 70. 最后一段中作者说“move things forward”的可能意思是“________”。 (1)通过题干和选项确定题目类型,定位信息源 ①题型判定: ②信息定位:由题干中的“in the last paragraph”可定位信息源为文章的 词义猜测题 第四段第二、三句 多媒体语篇精读课 ——阅读理解解题技法示范(2) 山东天成书业有限公司 阅读理解解题技法示范(2) 文化艺术类 高考典题 [1] Should we allow modern buildings to be built next to older buildings in a historic area of a city? In order to answer this question, we must first examine whether people really want to preserve the historic feel of an area. Not all historical buildings are attractive. However, there may be other reasons — for example, economic (经济的) reasons — why they should be preserved. So, let us assume that historical buildings are both attractive and important to the majority of people. What should we do then if a new building is needed? [2] In my view, new architectural styles can exist perfectly well alongside an older style. Indeed, there are many examples in my own home town of Tours where modern designs have been placed very successfully next to old buildings. As long as the building in question is pleasing and does not dominate (影响) its surroundings too much, it often improves the attractiveness of the area. [3] It is true that there are examples of new buildings which have spoilt (破坏) the area they are in, but the same can be said of some old buildings too. Yet people still speak against new buildings in historic areas. I think this is simply because people are naturally conservative (保守的) and do not like change. [4] Although we have to respect peoples feelings as fellow users of the buildings, I believe that it is the duty of the architect and planner to move_things_forward. If we always reproduced what was there before,

文档评论(0)

ee88870 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档