WritingforSuccessppt.pptVIP

Complementary evidence refers to different experiments showing the same thing in different ways; for example, the combination of RT-PCR, microarray and in situ results, or the combination of Western blotting and IHC * Complementary evidence refers to different experiments showing the same thing in different ways; for example, the combination of RT-PCR, microarray and in situ results, or the combination of Western blotting and IHC * Example of redundant display items is showing the same information in both a figure and a table. Use whatever format most clearly conveys this information * All that was required to describe this table in the main text was the following statement: “Clinical characteristics of all patients and tumor samples are summarized in Table 1”. * The tests that should be applied depend on the type of data * The tests that should be applied depend on the type of data * The tests that should be applied depend on the type of data * The tests that should be applied depend on the type of data * Example shows the description/use of statistics in the methods section, results section and figure legends of a paper * Unfortunately, many authors, particularly those from non-English-speaking countries, overlook the importance of this section considering it sufficient to merely present their results and allow the reader to draw their own conclusions. * Inconsistencies/controversies must be acknowledged and not ignored * Peer reviewers will comment on limitations, so it is best to be up front * Forms include copyright transfer and permissions forms * The reason for the experiment is described twice in slightly different terms * “The levels of ubiquitinated proteins were higher in patients than in control subjects” The “than clause” provides a reference for the term “higher” The comparing term, “higher” appears before the groups being compared “The levels of ubiquitinated proteins in patients were higher than those in control subjects” Here , the comparing term