- 1、本文档共63页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
《行政强制法》。
Administrative LawDr. He Chench1797@ Chapter 7: Administrative Coercion General Introduction Explaining of Administrative Coercion Law 7.1 General Introduction 7.1.1 concept Administrative coercion refers that administrative subject imposes compulsory measures on the personal freedom, property and so forth of counterpart in order to realize administrative aim. 7.1.2 range The range of administrative coercion includes compulsory administrative measure and compulsory execution, while the two have severe distinction: 1) their premises are not completely the same compulsory execution must be premised on the counterpart responsible for some kinds of duties, while compulsory administrative measure must not require the counterpart to be responsible for some kinds of duties, administrative organs could adopt it by themselves under certain conditions, such as prompt administrative coercion. 2) their aims are different the aims of compulsory execution are to force the counterpart to perform duties, while compulsory administrative measure is to ensure normal order of administrative management, to stop illegal act, to prevent the evidence from being damaged, to keep from harms happening, to control the larger danger. 7.1.3 administrative coercion and other relevant concepts administrative coercion and compulsory measure of administrative litigation(诉讼) the latter can be applied only by court in the activity of administrative litigation administrative coercion and administrative penalty The natures The ’purposes The legal consequences The applicable frequencies(适用频率) The results of action administrative coercion and rehabilitation-through-labour 一种观点认为,劳动教养是限制人身自由的行政强制措施。这种观点的主要依据是: 1957年国务院公布的《关于劳动教养问题的决定》第2条明确了“劳动教养是对于被劳动教养的人实行强制教育改造的一种措施,也是对他们安置就业的一种办法。” 1982年国务院转发公安部修订的《劳动教养试行办法》第2条规定,“劳动教养是对被劳动教养的人实行强制教育改造的行政措施,是处理人民内部矛盾的一种方法。” 国务院(1980)56号《国务院关于强制劳动和收容审查两项措施统一于劳动教养的通知》中规定,“从目前执行情况来看,强制劳动的对象和收容审查的对象同劳动教养的对象基本相同,没有实质性的区别。现在规定,将强制劳动和收容审查两项措施统一于劳动教养。” 另一种
文档评论(0)