香港雇员工作生活质素及信心调查Employees’Well-beingandConfidence.ppt

主要研究結果 (IV) Major Findings (IV) 在批發、零售業，與在飲食及酒店業工作的受訪者，他們的工作滿意度相若。但是，在工作安全感及工作前景方面，前者比後者有較大信心。 Respondents in the Wholesale, retail industries and the Restaurants and hotels industries reported similar levels of confidence in regards to Well-being. However, the former indicated much higher levels of confidence than the latter in regards to Job Security and Job Prospect. End of Presentation. Thank you! * Age Discrimination Index (ADI) 年齡歧視指數 5-point scale: 1 – Extremely disagree; 5 – Extremely agree 五分制 : 1 – 極之不同意, 5 – 極之同意 N=155 Mean平均值 * Age Discrimination (AD) 年齡歧視 5-point scale: 1 – Extremely disagree; 5 – Extremely agree 五分制 : 1 – 極之不同意, 5 – 極之同意 Mean平均值 The reasons of age discrimination 年齡歧視原因 N=155 * Age Discrimination (AD) 年齡歧視 5-point scale: 1 – Extremely disagree; 5 – Extremely agree 五分制 : 1 – 極之不同意, 5 – 極之同意 消除年齡歧視 Eliminating age discrimination N=805 * Age Discrimination (AD) 年齡歧視 立法以消除年齡歧視 Enacting a law to eliminate age discrimination N=805 * Age Discrimination (AD) 年齡歧視 N=805 * 在所有受訪者當中，有155名受訪者認為就業中存在年齡歧視，僅占樣本總數的19.3%。 大多數香港雇員（80.7%）認為就業中並不存在年齡歧視。 年齡歧視指數是3.33，表示有歧視的問題出現，但情況未算嚴重：招聘方面存在的年齡歧視最嚴重（average score 3.76），而福利方面的年齡歧視最小（average score 2.71） 受訪者認為存在年齡歧視最主要的原因是，年長雇員效率比較低. 為了消除年齡歧視，受訪者普遍認為應給予年長雇員同等機會。 絕大多數雇員（占樣本總數約75%，N=805）指出所在單位的實際退休年齡在55-65歲左右，且他們的理想退休年齡也在55-65歲左右。 在受訪的雇員中（N=805），約77%的雇員贊成政府立法以消除就業方面的年齡歧視，而約23%的雇員則不贊成該項立法。 主要研究結果 (I) Major Findings (I) * Only 155 respondents (accounts for 19.3% of total sample) think there is age discrimination in employment, while most respondents (accounts for 80.7% of total sample) think no age discrimination exists in employment. From this sample, the Age Discrimination Index derived is 3.33. The degree of age discrimination in recruitment is highest, while the degree of age discrimination in fringe benefits is lowest. The main reason of age discrimination is the lower efficiency of older employees. 主要研究結果 (I) Major Findings (I) * To eliminate age discrimination, respondents agree to a