GoogleandGoogleScholar-BodleianLibrariesHome.ppt

GoogleandGoogleScholar-BodleianLibrariesHome.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共48页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
GoogleandGoogleScholar-BodleianLibrariesHome

Pros and Cons Katharine Jackson January 2010 (adapted from the 2009 session) Today Google Scholar offers a very convenient method of retrieving article citations and often the accompanying full text, and is growing in popularity. This session offers tips on using it effectively and extending your search to other sources should Scholars coverage prove inadequate for your purposes. The World Wide Web – how useful is it? Coverage of Google Scholar (GS) Using Google Scholar to find academic material How to get the most out of Google Scholar Pros and Cons in comparison to other sources Welcome to the Web Welcome to the Web The world’s biggest haystack Looking for a needle - why start in a haystack? Why do people love Google? Very fast – it even tells you how fast Brings up a large number of results Often has a number of ‘relevant’ results within the first page Simple interface It’s free Finding needles – how does Google do it? Google is an index of web pages It uses clever algorithms that take into account links from other pages and click throughs BUT Google are very secretive as to exactly how they do it So why not use it for journal articles?... Individual articles may not be a web page Articles may be behind a firewall and how are you going to know? The sheer amount of results Are the top results the ‘best result’? How would you index an article? Read it? Google doesn’t read Give it controlled index terms? Google doesn’t have a controlled vocabulary Be able to see the context? Google is not able to determine context So what did Google do…. Teamed up with publishers so they let them search behind their firewalls Modified the algorithm so it excludes non-scholarly material (as defined by Google of course) Used citations to help relevance Included library locations for full-text access (Library Link) But what did they not do… Create controlled vocabularies Create standardisation of journal names/abbreviations Give any details of which jo

文档评论(0)

***** + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8010045112000002

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档