博士论文答辩ppt5.pptVIP

Study on Conceptual Design of Tritium Production Reactor based on ST HE Kaihui HUANG Jinhua Division 105 of Southwestern Institute of Physics, Chengdu, P. R. China 2017年4月9日 Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. Contents Comparison of tritium production Neutronics design of ST-TPR Preliminary overall design of ST-TPR Conclusion and future work Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. Comparison of Tritium Production D-T fusion is the most probable solution for fusion energy Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. Comparison of tritium production facilities Facilities Time Reactor power, MWth Fuel TBR (net) Production (Kg/a) availability Tritium cost,$/g* HWR 1988 2500 235U-Fission 0.8 7 70% 101,000 MHTGR 1988 2800 0.8 7.8 70% 55,600 APT 1989 400 1.6GeV,P-beam Pb(Liq.)target 40-50 6.8 70% 162,000 TM 1982 540 D-T Fusion for MCF 0.67 10.8 70% 36,200 TOK 1982 570 0.52 9.1 70% 48,600 TTPR 1997 500~1000 0.43 2.0 25% Not given ICF-TPR 1985 532 D-T Fusion for ICF 1.08 16.9 70% 12,300 SIRIUS-T 1986 1410 0.90 33.6 70% 10,300 *1990US$, reference “comparison of tritium production reactors”,Fus.technol. Vol 19, 1991 Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. Tritium Production Approaches 1. Nuclear reaction in nature; 2. Nuclear explosion; 3. Fission reactor: Heavy-water reactor; Light-water reactor; 4. Accelerator production tritium; 5. Breeding zone in fusion reactor. Evaluation only. Created with Aspose.Slides for .NET 3.5 Client Profile 5.2.0.0. Copyright 2004-2011 Aspose Pty Ltd. Advantages of APT l??????No fissile materials l????????No spent nuclear fuel produced l??????? Produces very little low-level and no high-level radioactive waste per year l?????