网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

经济学原理曼昆-ch01-presentation.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
经济学原理曼昆-ch01-presentation.ppt

* * * [“Govt” is an abbreviation for government. Throughout all of the Premium PowerPoint chapters, I try to use abbreviations the way a thoughtful instructor would use them if writing on a chalkboard or dry-erase whiteboard. If you prefer to spell the word out, just use your mouse to highlight “govt” and then type out the full word.] Two examples of the idea in the second bullet point: A restaurant won’t serve meals if customers do not pay before they leave. A music company won’t produce CDs if too many people avoid paying by making illegal copies. Many fledging market economies are struggling through the transition from central planning because they have not developed institutions that protect and enforce property rights. The British news magazine The Economist has lots of current examples of this. An older but still interesting example comes from a column that Mankiw wrote in the June 12, 2000 issue of Fortune magazine entitled “Ukraine: How Not To Run An Economy.” * * * The items in this list are meant to get students thinking about Principles 6 and 7 in the context of specific examples, and to generate discussion rather than arrive at definitive answers. NOTE: Discussing the entire list would consume a lot of class time (20-25 minutes). Two would suffice. Pick your favorite two and delete the others. Of course, you can skip this slide entirely if you wish to get through the chapter as quickly as possible. Here are some notes which might help guide the discussion: a. Public schools. The alternative would be private schools. The cost of education would be concentrated among those with school-aged children, rather than spread over all taxpayers, so the price per child would likely be high. Some families would not be able to afford to enroll their children in schools, and would either home-school the children or raise them without education. Is the benefit to society of having an educated population large enough to justify making people with

文档评论(0)

cai + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档