网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

考研英语阅读例题:Humancommunication:Gesturepolitics人类的交流:肢体语言.docVIP

考研英语阅读例题:Humancommunication:Gesturepolitics人类的交流:肢体语言.doc

  1. 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
考研英语阅读例题:Humancommunication:Gesturepolitics人类的交流:肢体语言

Human communication:Gesture politics肢体语言[2010.10.28] The Economist IT IS received wisdom that humanity owes a lot of its evolutionary success to its remarkable ability to communicate. So much so, in fact, that few have bothered to test this hypothesis in any systematic way. Now, a group of researchers led by Andrew King, of the Royal Veterinary College in Britain, has tried to plug this gaping hole. Their first results have just been published in Biology Letters. ? ?Hunter-gatherers’ practice of scouring their surroundings for edible plants is responsible for half of the name anthropologists have bestowed on them. And for good reason. With hunting likely to have been an intermittent diversion, effective foraging would have been crucial to tiding early humans over to the next woolly mammoth. So Dr King and his colleagues conducted a study to see how, if at all, communication enhances foraging prowess. ? ?They recruited 121 visitors to, rather appropriately, the London Zoo, and split them into 43 groups. Each group contained between two and seven people. Some were single-sex and some mixed. Some were composed of family and friends whereas others brought together complete strangers. Half the groups were allowed to communicate freely. The rest were told to exchange no verbal signals or gestures of any kind.? Unsurprisingly, the groups that were allowed to communicate proved the more effective foragers. They were much likelier than their non-communicating peers to converge on the greenest patches. What did come as something of a surprise, however, was the nature of the communication that mattered. The researchers monitored noise levels and hand gestures. Noise levels served as a proxy for verbal communication; gestures, for the non-verbal sort. Dr King found that the only thing which explained the probability of lighting on the best patch was gesture use, which peaked just before consensus was reached. Noise levels remained more or less constant the whole time, suggest

文档评论(0)

panguoxiang + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档