VDA6.3缺失项表格解读.docx

KONE Supplier Validation Audit Report Audit Location Wujiang Juli Audit Date November 13, 2015 Audit Type KONE Supplier Validation Audit Audit Leader Tom Yung Audit Criteria KONE Supplier Audit Checklist (ref. VDA 6.3:2010) No. VDA6.3 clause Findings in diagnostic audit 审计中发现 (on July 2-3, 2015) Score得分 (DA) Validation audit result 验证审核结果 (on Nov. 13, 2015) Photo file no. [note] Score (VA) 1 2.1 APQP flow chart (JL-QP-35 8.0) did not define the responsibility who to identify customer requirements and link to marketing process (According to the drawing from customer, processing from where to start). The APQP procudure has no reference to the customer milestones, and could not reflect the synchronization of the work items in the PQP time plan,such as protype manufacture and prosess design. APQP流程图（jl-qp-35 8）没有明确责任谁来确定顾客的要求和链接到营销过程（根据客户的图纸加工从哪里开始）。APQP过程没有涉及重要阶段，并不能反映在PQP的时间计划工作项目的同步，如原型制造和工艺设计。 4 APQP flow chart had defined the responsibility of customer requirements review. The procudure has no reference to the internal and customer milestones. The procedure had included product design functions and the technical department only had process development. APQP流程定义客户需求的责任审查。这个程序没有可供参考的内部和客户的重要事件。该过程包括产品设计功能，技术部门只有过程开发。 0342, 0343 4 2 2.2 In MAP2 Floor pedal development project,there was not a team list, and five from development department. No definition of each individual responsibilities, especially production capacity and logisticanalysis.For the project without design responsibility, the start points for team members with different responsibility was not defined in APQP procedure. 在MAP2踏板开发项目，开发部没有一个团队名单。每一个人的责任，没有明确的定义，特别是生产能力和物流分析。该项目没有设计责任，团队成员各自责任的起始点不在APQP过程定义。 6 The procedure had definition of the functions of each project team members, it did not include quality, technical development and capacity planning functions. The project leader had not been designated with sufficient authority and top management support. 该程序定义了每个项目团队成员的功能，它不包括质量、技术开发和产量