Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation.pdf

下载文档

4
0
约3.59万字
约 10页
2017-04-06 发布于江苏
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation.pdf

1、本文档共10页，可阅读全部内容。
2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation

/locate/fcr Field Crops Research 93 (2005) 132–141Grain yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of maize under deficit irrigation C. Kirda*, S. Topcu, H. Kaman, A.C. Ulger, A. Yazici, M. Cetin, M.R. Derici Faculty of Agriculture, Cukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey Received 11 March 2004; received in revised form 17 September 2004; accepted 17 September 2004AbstractGrain yield response and nitrogen (N) fertiliser recovery of maize (Zea mays L. cv. Sele) were assessed as influenced by deficit irrigation that was imposed either using conventional deficit irrigation (DI) or partial root drying (PRD) practice. The two deficit irrigation treatments were compared with FULL irrigation, the control treatment where rooting zone soil-water content was increased to field capacity at each irrigation, whereas 50% deficit irrigation was applied to the deficit treatments, DI50 and PRD50. Under the PRD practice, one-half of the rooting zone was wetted while the other half was maintained partially dry, thereby reduced amount of irrigation water was needed. The wetted and partially dry sides were interchanged in the subsequent irrigations. Under conventional DI, plants again received reduced amounts of water but the water was uniformly applied to both sides of the plant row. A popular hybrid maize–cultivar Sele was planted, following harvest of wheat. The study was conducted for two consecutive years in 2001 and 2002. A composite fertiliser of N, P and K, all at 80 kg ha1 was applied before planting. At the ninth leaf (V9) stage, a second application of N-fertiliser at 170 kg N ha1 rate was made. Difference method (plots with or without N-fertiliser application) was used for estimation of plant N-uptake efficiency. Contrary to earlier reports, the PRD treatment did not result in any yield benefit compared to the conventional deficit irrigation. The range of grain yield reduction under deficit irrigation treatments, DI50 and PRD50, was 10–25% and significant (P 0.01), compar