- 1、本文档共12页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
IN RE ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 854
IN RE ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.,
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION,
and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.,
Petitioners.
Adrian M. Pruetz, Pruetz Law Group, LLP, of El Segundo, California, for
petitioners. With him on the petition was Erica J. Pruetz. Of counsel on the petition
were Brian C. Cannon and Tun-Jen Chiang, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver Hedges
LLP, of Redwood Shores, California.
Ricardo Rodriguez, Cooley Godward Kronish LLP, of Palo Alto, California, for
respondents The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. With
him on the response were Michelle S. Rhyu and Benjamin G. Damstedt.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California
Judge Marilyn Hall Patel
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET NO. 854
IN RE ROCHE MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.,
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION,
and ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS OPERATIONS, INC.,
Petitioners.
On Writ of Mandamus from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
in case no. 05-CV-04158, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MAYER, Circuit
Judge.
Order for the Court filed PER CURIAM. Dissenting order filed by Circuit Judge
NEWMAN.
O R D E R
Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. et al. (Roche) petition for a writ of mandamus to
direct the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to (1) vacate
its April 16, 2007 order granting in part The Leland Stanford Jr. University’s (Stanford)
motion for summary judgment and denying Roche’s motion for summary judgment and
(2) enter judgment in favor of Roche. Stanford opposes. Roche moves for leave to
reply, with reply attached. Stanford opposes and moves,
您可能关注的文档
- Hard X-ray Observations of Magnetic Cataclysmic Variables.pdf
- Harvard School of Public Health Authors.pdf
- Hausdorff dimension of repellors in low sensitive systems.pdf
- HBC THE BAY - Holiday 2010.pdf
- HBT neonate.pdf
- HDL 2000机票打印机驱动安装.docx
- hdmi 7511W 芯片资料.pdf
- HDMI Marking Description.pdf
- Hearing Conversation Training Material.ppt
- HearNPVP26蛋白的结构解析.docx
文档评论(0)