The OntoWordNet Project extension and axiomatization of conceptual relations in WordNet.pdf

The OntoWordNet Project extension and axiomatization of conceptual relations in WordNet.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共18页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
The OntoWordNet Project extension and axiomatization of conceptual relations in WordNet

The OntoWordNet Project: extension and axiomatization of conceptual relations in WordNet Aldo Gangemi 1 , Roberto Navigli 2 , Paola Velardi 2 1 Laboratory for Applied Ontology, ISTC-CNR, viale Marx 15, 00137 Roma, Italy gangemi@r.it 2 Dipartimento di Informatica, University of Roma “La Sapienza” via Salaria 113, 00198 Roma, Italy {navigli,velardi}@dsi.uniroma1.it Abstract. In this paper we present a progress report of the OntoWordNet project, a research program aimed at achieving a formal specification of WordNet. Within this program, we developed a hybrid bottom-up top-down methodology to automatically extract association relations from WordNet, and to interpret those associations in terms of a set of conceptual relations, formally defined in the DOLCE foundational ontology. Preliminary results provide us with the conviction that a research program aiming to obtain a consistent, modularized, and axiomatized ontology from WordNet can be completed in acceptable time with the support of semi-automatic techniques. 1. Introduction The number of applications where WordNet (WN) is being used as an ontology rather than as a mere lexical resource seems to be ever growing. Indeed, WordNet contains a good coverage of both the lexical and conceptual palettes of the English language. However, WordNet is serviceable as an ontology (in the sense of a theory expressed in some logical language) if some of its lexical links are interpreted according to a formal semantics that tells us something about the way we use a lexical item in some context for some purpose. In other words, we need a formal specification of the conceptualizations that are expressed by means of WordNet’s synsets 1 . A formal specification requires a clear semantics for the primitives used to export WordNet 1 Concept names in WordNet are called synsets, since the naming policy for a concept is a set of synonym words, e.g. for sense 1 of car: { car, auto, automob

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档