- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
94年10月gre考试阅读真题解析(A)-智课教育旗下智课教育
智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料
94年10月gre考试阅读真题解析(A)-智课教育旗下智课
教育
新gre考试阅读中对于逻辑题的考生是一个重点,但真题也不容错
过。复习gre考试阅读的时候,gre考生应该以往年的真题为复习材料,
从真题中总结阅读规律和特点才是制胜法宝。
新gre考试阅读中对于逻辑题的考生是一个重点,但真题也不容错
过。接下来的几天给大家整理了历届gre考试阅读真题及解析,下面这
篇是1994年10月gre考试阅读真题SECTION A部分。复习gre考试阅读
的时候,gre考生应该以往年的真题为复习材料,从真题中总结阅读规
律和特点才是制胜法宝。
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution, ratified in 1868, prohibits state governments from
denying citizens the “equal protection of the laws.” Although
precisely what the framers of the amendment meant by this
equal protection clause remains unclear, all interpreters agree
that the framers’ immediate objective was to provide a
constitutional warrant for the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which
guaranteed the citizenship of all persons born in the United
States and subject to United States jurisdiction. This declaration,
which was echoed in the text of the Fourteenth Amendment, was
designed primarily to counter the Supreme Court’s ruling in
Dred Scott v. Sandford that Black people in the United States
could be denied citizenship. The act was vetoed by President
Andrew Johnson, who argued that the Thirteenth Amendment,
which abolished slavery, did not provide Congress with the
authority to extend citizenship and equal protection to the freed
slaves. Although Congress promptly overrode Johnson’s veto,
supporters of the act sought to ensure its constitutional
foundations with the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The broad language of the amendment strongly suggests
that its framers were proposing to write into the Constitution not
a laundry list (laundry list: n.细目清单) of specific civil rights but a
principle of equal citizenship that forbids organized society from
treating any individual as a member of an inferior class. Yet for
the first eight decades of the amendment’s existence, the
Supreme Court’s interpretation of the amendment betrayed
this ideal of equality. In the Civil Rights Cases of 1883, for
example, the Court invented the “state action” limitation,
whic
您可能关注的文档
- 2012雅思口语话题范文 Swimming-智课教育出国考试.pdf
- 2013 Effect of a brown seaweed (Laminaria digitata) extract containing laminarin and.pdf
- 2013 YOU-IJMPC-A fractal approach to spontaneous imbibition height in natural porous media.pdf
- 2013-1.339-SS模型.pdf
- 2013-An Early-Warning Methodology of Work safety for Chemical Industry.pdf
- 2013-Assessment Model of Accident Emergency Management System.pdf
- 2013.11WhenBigDataMeetsBigSmog-ABigSpatio-temporal DataFrameworkforChinaSevereSmogAnalysis.pdf
- 20130513配套ppt.ppt
- 2013厦门国际礼品、工艺品及家居用品展览会招商函.pdf
- 2013同等学力--英语--精品提分--王蕙老师.pdf
文档评论(0)