GRE写作argument官方范文优劣分析-智课教育旗下智课教育.pdf

智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料 GRE写作argument官方范文优劣分析-智课教育旗下智 课教育 为了帮助同学们高效备考，智课教育小编为同学们准备了新GRE写 作argument官方范文优劣分析，希望同学们通过范文不同分段的优劣 分析，找到GRE写作的得分点。 下文就是新GRE写作argument官方范文优劣分析的相关内容，同 学们可以参考以下GRE写作范文的写作思路和写作方法，加以学习，衡 量自己的写作和范文之间的差距，找到高分突破点，取得好成绩。 下面来看以Hospital为主题的范文，小编为大家依次展示6-1分不 等的例文，大家可以好好研讨一下，肯定会有很大收获。 The following sample argument response received a score of 6: The argument above is well-presented and appears to be relatively sound at first glance: because of the hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller-skating accidents, the roller skaters should investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment in order to reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident. However, as more light is shed on the issue and more detailed facts are concerned, it is easy to see that the argument suffers from several grave fallacies in its assumptions as well as commits a false analogy. To begin with, as mentioned in the argument, there are two distinct kinds of gear—preventative gear, such as light reflecting material, and protective gear, such as helmets. Preventative gear is intended to warn others, presumably for the most part motorists, of the presence of the roller skater. It works only if the “other” is a responsible and caring individual who will afford the skater the necessary space and attention. Protective gear is intended to reduce the effect of any accident, whether it is caused by another, the skater or some force of nature. Protective gear does little, if anything, to prevent accidents but is presumed to reduce the injuries that occur in an accident. The statistics on injuries suffered by skaters would be more interesting if the skaters were grouped into those wearing no gear at all, those wearing protective gear only, those wearing preventative gear only and those wearing both. These statistics could provide skaters with a clearer understanding of which kinds of gear are more beneficial. In addition, the argument is