- 1、本文档共24页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
United States Court of Appeals
For the First Circuit
No. 10-1764
SIMON GLIK,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
JOHN CUNNIFFE, in his individual capacity; PETER J. SAVALIS, in
his individual capacity; JEROME HALL-BREWSTER, in his individual
capacity; CITY OF BOSTON,
Defendants, Appellants.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Lipez, and Howard,
Circuit Judges.
Ian D. Prior, Assistant Corporation Counsel, City of Boston
Law Department, with whom William F. Sinnott, Corporation Counsel,
and Lisa Skehill Maki, Assistant Corporation Counsel, were on
brief, for appellants.
David Milton, with whom Howard Friedman, Law Offices of Howard
Friedman, P.C., Sarah Wunsch, and ACLU of Massachusetts were on
brief, for appellee.
Anjana Samant and Center for Constitutional Rights on brief
for Berkeley Copwatch, Communities United Against Police Brutality,
Justice Committee, Milwaukee Police Accountability Coalition,
Nodutdol for Korean Community Development, and Portland Copwatch,
amici curiae.
August 26, 2011
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Simon Glik was arrested for using
his cell phones digital video camera to film several police
officers arresting a young man on the Boston Common. The charges
against Glik, which included violation of Massachusettss wiretap
statute and two other state-law offenses, were subsequently judged
baseless and were dismissed. Glik then brought this suit under 42
U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that his arrest for filming the officers
constituted a violation of his rights under the First and Fourth
Amendments.
In this interlocutory appeal, the defendant police
officers challenge an order of the district court denying them
qualified immunity on Gliks constitutional claims. We conclude,
based on the facts alleged, that Glik was exercising clearly-
established First Amendment rights in filming the officers in a
public space, and that his clearly-established Fourth Amendment
ri
您可能关注的文档
- The development of location based services in mobile commerce.pdf
- The effect of iron contaminants on thiosulphate leaching of gold.pdf
- The effect of EGM2008-based normal, normal-orthometric and Helmert orthometric height systems.pdf
- The Effect of Laser Focusing Conditions on Propagation and Monoenergetic Electron Productio.pdf
- The effect of microstructure on fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth behaviour in γ.pdf
- The effect of using different comminution procedures on the flotation of Platinum-Group Minerals.pdf.doc
- The Effects of Electronic Supply Chain Design (eSCD) on Coordination and Knowledge Sharing.pdf
- The Effects of Technological Advancement.pdf
- The Emergence of Self-organizing E-commerce Ecosystems in Remote Villages of China.pdf
- The entanglement in one-dimensional random XY spin chain with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interac.pdf
- 两个相干源产生波具有3b chmc.pdf
- wifi高性能模块ce fcc rohs认证-xrf report电子档.pdf
- linux pci multiport installation manual多端口安装手册.pdf
- 二章基本概念理论.pdf
- 互联网工程任务组ietfs turnerrfc5940 txt.pdf
- mtz0数学高级证明集合关系群mathematics paper 3 sets relations and groups french.pdf
- 网上书店需求规格说明.pdf
- 系统测试用例pcweb终端.pdf
- apv1 keil环境下接口兼容问题.pdf
- 2023届江西省八所重点中学高三3月联考英语试题(原卷版).docx
文档评论(0)