武夷山风景名胜区景观美学评价及感知差异研究.pdfVIP

t:.爹爹 d且 2012,2(10):32-36 Joumal of Agriculture www.caaJ.org 武夷山风景名胜区景观美学评价及感知差异研究 郑华敏 1七熊居华 3，郑郁善 1 c福建农林大学园林学院，福州1350002; 2武夷学院艺术系，福建武夷山 354300; 3武夷山风景名胜区园建工程有限公司，福建武夷山 354300) 摘要:以武夷山风景名胜区核心景观区为研究对象，通过65 个样地典型样本照片，采用美景度评判法 (SBE法)计算景观美景度值，并进行方差分析。结果表明 :3 个景观类型美景度为人工景观〉文化景观 〉自然景观，三者间不存在显著差异;自然景观类为水体景观天象景观〉地形地貌景观植物景观， 差异极显著;人工景观类为人工建筑小品景观道路景观服务设施景观，差异极显著;文化景观类为 纪念建筑景观遗址遗迹景观〉摩崖石刻景观，不存在显著差异;各景观构成要素间为水体景观〉纪念 建筑〉遗迹遗址〉天象景观〉人工建筑小品〉地形地貌〉道路景观摩崖石刻〉服务设施〉植物景 观，要素间差异极显著。 关键词:景观坪价;SBE 法;感知差异;武夷山风景名胜区 中图分类号: S73 1.3 文献标志码 :A 论文编号 :2012-0288 Landscape Aesthetic Assessment and Perception Difference of Wuyishan Scenery District Zheng Huamin1气 Xiong Juhu矿， Zheng Yushan1 CCollege 0/ Landscape Architecture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 354300, Fujian, China; 2Depαrtment 0/ Art, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, Fujian, China; Wuyishan Scenery District Garden Construction Engineering Co. ， μd， Wuyishan 350002, Fujian, China) Abstract: Taking the core area of Wuyishan scenerγdistrict as the object, the paper obtained scenic beauty estimation values of 65 typical sample photos by SBE method and preference difference by ANOV A. Results showed that the ranking of three types was cultural landscape artificial landscape natural landscape and there was no significant difference between them; the ranking of naturallandscape was waterscape sky view landformplant landscape and There was highly significant difference between them; the ranking of artificial landscape was architectural sketchroad landscapeservice facilities landscape, and there was highly significant difference between them; the ranking of cultural landscape was memorial building relics cliff stone, and there was no significant difference between them; the ranking of all elements was waterscape memorial buildingrelicssky viewarchitectural sketch landfo口n landform road landscape cliff stoneservice facilities landscapeplant landscape, and there was highly significant difference between them