刑事诉讼论文：试论刑事诉讼证明责任分配.docVIP

刑事诉讼论文：试论刑事诉讼证明责任的分配 【中文摘要】在当前中国,在刑事诉讼证明主体不确定、证明对象内容多但范围窄、证明标准单一化的现状,忽视了证明主体之间举证能力的大小的不同,忽视了证明对象本身的差异,忽视了证明标准的层次性和多元性,不能形成划分证明责任所必须的科学体系,也使我国刑事诉讼证明责任的分配和承担处于一种较为混乱现状。学界对于这种现状进行了分析和论证,并提出了对证明责任体系构建的观点。有些观点立足于现状,结合现有刑事诉讼制度,提出一些改良的方案;而另外一些观点则趋向于对刑事诉讼证明责任制度进而对整个刑事诉讼制度进行体制上的大手术。笔者来自司法实务界,为完成论文,参阅了大量的书籍和文献资料,引用了其中较为成熟的观点论证自己的设想,并提出了一些自己的观点和意见。囿于理论研究水平和司法工作人员身份,笔者提出的一些观点可能比较幼稚,甚至带有一些先入为主的观念。但是,“实践是检验真理的唯一标准”,笔者的部分观点,在一定程度上反映了司法工作者对证明责任制度的困扰和对当前刑事诉讼证明责任制度的反思。笔者希望通过本文,能对司法实践中混乱的证明责任分配找出一些可以走的路子和方法。本文拟从司法实践中遇到的三个贪污、贿赂案例出发,重新界定刑事诉讼证明主体、证明对象,重新设定刑事诉讼证明标准,分析我国证明责任的概念,探析构建我国证明责任体系的必要原则,并为构建我国刑事诉讼控辩双方证明责任提出一点自己的想法。同时,笔者认为,构建我国刑事诉讼证明责任制度必须要坚持无罪推定的原则、坚持平衡控辩双方诉讼力量的原则、坚持证明便利原则、坚持常损害原则、坚持合理地有利于被告人的原则,在此基础上合理的划分控辩双方的证明责任。 【英文摘要】In current China, in criminal judicial proof subject not sure, the object of proof, more content but narrow range, standards of proof of the present situation of simplification, ignoring the burden of proof ability between the size of the different, and ignore the object of proof itself differences, and ignore the standards of proof of hierarchy and diversity, can’t form division to proof responsibility system of science, also make our criminal judicial proof the allocation of responsibility and take in a more chaotic situation. Academic circles for this kind of analysis of the current situation and argument, and proposed to the proof responsibility system construction point of view. Some view based on present situation, in line with the existing criminal litigation system, and puts forward some improvement plan; And some other ideas tend to the proof system in criminal action and the whole criminal judicial system system on the operation.The author from judicial practice, to complete paper, refer to a large number of books and literature material, cited among the more mature view demonstrates his own ideas, and puts forward some ideas and opinions. Instead of the theory research level and judicial p