3种中药注射剂治疗中风方案成本-效果分析.pdfVIP

2015 年 3 月第 22 卷第 3 期 中国中医药信息杂志 ·115· ·医院药学· 3 种中药注射剂治疗中风方案成本-效果分析 王慧,李婷,左文,葛艳 徐州市中医院药剂科,江苏 徐州 221000 摘要：目的 比较 3 种中药注射剂治疗中风的临床疗效并进行药物经济学成本-效果分析。方法 采用回 顾性调查方法,将 115 例中风病例根据治疗用药的不同分为血塞通组(A 组)、红花黄色素组(B 组)、血栓通组(C 组),运用药物经济学的成本-效果分析方法进行评价。结果 A 组、B 组、C 组治疗中风的成本分别为 1030.4 元、 1876.0 元、1545.6 元,成本-效果比分别为 12.07、21.18、17.17,B 组、C 组相对于 A 组的增量成本-效果比分 别为 264.25、110.32。结论 注射用血栓通较注射用血塞通和注射用红花黄色素具有药物经济学优势。 关键词：中风；中药注射剂成本-效果分析；药物经济学 DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1005-5304.2015.03.033 中图分类号：R288 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1005-5304(2015)03-0115-02 Analysis on Cost-Effect of Three TCM Injections for the Treatment of Stroke WANG Hui, LI Ting, ZUO Wen, GE Yan (Department of Pharmacy, Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou 221000, China) Abstract：Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and carry out analysis on pharmacoeconomic cost-effect of three therapeutic schemes in the treatment for stroke. Methods Through a retrospective survey method, 115 stroke patients, based on different treatment methods, were divided into 3 groups：Xuesaitong group (A), carthamin yellow group (B), and Xueshuantong group (C). An analysis on pharmacoeconomic cost-effect was conducted. Results The costs of three therapeutic schemes were 1030.4 yuan, 1876 yuan, and 1545.6 yuan, respectively. The total effective rates of stroke patients in groups A, B and C were 85.37%, 88.57% and 90.04%, respectively. The cost-effect ratios of groups A, B and C were 12.07, 21.18, and 17.17. The added cost-effect ratios of groups B and C compared with group A were 264.25 and 110.32, respectively. Conclusion Xueshuantong Injection has more pharmacoeconomic advantage than Xuesaitong and carthamin yellow Injections in treating stroke. Key words：strok