王羲之楷书欣赏.doc

王羲之楷书欣赏  HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f854b05b723e40d173e1b7f99aa94e75dc9a47612fad12a71b62ca47d34d1b12c317a7f22a50d0ab5a79ad21ff703ecd472e68fb608fd258114b8cdbd5ca526be6e6e01bc5a=28b=28 \t _blank   HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f8512073bbae8cd65a6a0715a3b24b96f84584fbe1e02ff99bb6a46f07a655eee3396592a0fadfd50314b370495d6d150d08c2f95911a=10b=12 \t _blank   HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f8c825796520698c7488db68c46a3b127a26d253eacbf21e66e9b791330298292a080082ca824bad69407fbb377b4c22fad9f7caf79f0f0e714dac3e60fedb40334addb2d6a=10b=28 \t _blank   HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f8b055b078526113d832d7e141b97e5f9d8e197f764339773d3595edc8a5a96de0e00dfb3eb01ffe051d1447dcdee07d0ba43467eb1bfa0c74c129a30512f9f69b51ee92e8a=28b=28 \t _blank   HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f8a97cfbd9ce1b92bde2b3da4c234c94e30802f726ac0188697d57f2a1dd5424ea4617950723aaa14c77768249786e113f235447b2ede854470594a=28b=28 \t _blank   HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f8ce7eda6383c1e4db3108cd6f732182391e81700f4e6d940aedb35c6bfd9adb2f2af51ca3b72207627350d917a9437bfb8f11a4ed714904de0b30ad1cc06eaea=28b=28 \t _blank   HYPERLINK /http_imgload.cgi?/rurl4_b=b77f8e540190976e8d3f8b02c291a3f88d8f8fe40df4ff381ca4eb80025ebe2d4a6b2739d983a63ba4e1249096ba772db39beb3fc9b8943de058baebb25681bde3893db35ca08c5d2b0ba86f39886aa7b59adceaa=28b=28 \t _blank  ? ? 《笔阵图十二章》王羲之撰 ? 载于唐代韦续《墨薮》。南宋陈振孙《直斋书录解题》没有标明作者，而是说不知何代所辑。《四库全书》没有指出此文是韦续所辑。孙过庭《书谱》云代传羲之《与子敬笔势论十章》??。可能《笔阵图十二章》在初唐已经流传。《墨薮》原题为《笔阵图十二章》说明此文与《笔阵图》、《题后》有联系，有人分析《题后》有可能是从本文中摘录汇集而成的。孙过庭认为右军位重才高，调清词雅，而《笔势论十章》文鄙理疏，意乖言拙，所以他断定此文绝非出于右军之手。孙过庭所说的《笔势十章》是否是我们今天所见的十二章已无从查考。《笔势论十二章》是否是王菱之所撰仍值得探讨，但认为是王羲之一派的书论，则无大的争议。　　《笔势论》前言部分这样写道：告汝子敬：吾察汝书性过人，仍未闲规矩。父不亲教，自古有之，今述《笔势论》一篇，开汝之悟。凡斯字势，犹有十二章