資料、證據與官方採用數據在鑑定個案之應用.doc

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 21 資料、證據與官方採用數據在鑑定個案之應用 A Study on Information, Evidence and Official Data to Identification of Cases 葉詩笛 長榮大學航運管理學系學生。 Yeh, Shih-Di 吳林源 陸軍軍官學校機械工程學系副教授。 Wu, Lin-Yuan 黃國平 國立成功大學交通管理科學系副教授。 Huang, Guo-Ping 林佐鼎 國立成功大學交通管理科學系副教授。 Lin, Zuo-Ding 摘要 我國車鑑會在2002年2月修訂公佈施行之「公路法」第67條修訂內容中，規定行車事故鑑定委員會須由專家學者擔任，此次修訂使行車事故鑑定專業化上向前邁進了一大步。有一良好之鑑定制度才能發揮鑑定最大的功能，在不同區域的車鑑會，對案件的鑑定仍有差異，但尚未有一個不至於誤導法官冤枉好人的標準。過去有許多的學者著墨於肇事者行車事故之行為或是肇事現場相關跡證之認定等研究，較少學者針對後續肇事責任及賠償或鑑定肇事原因等做探討。 本研究依九十六年度高屏澎區、高雄市、台南區車鑑會車鑑會已完成鑑定之案例經過彙整之後，發現三個車鑑會對於號誌路口有證人證詞案的鑑定案件，鑑定的結果各有不同，高屏澎區完全採信證人證詞為鑑定依據；台南區車鑑會多數採信證人證詞為鑑定依據；高雄市車鑑會則是採保守態度，證人證詞與現場跡證不完全相符時不鑑定，證人證詞與現場跡證相符者採分析函覆，多數的案件是不鑑定。案例型態經過彙整後設計一份問卷，其設計方向可分為三大項目，一為肇事者一方稱黃燈進入路口、另一方稱綠燈進入路口，二是肇事者雙方皆說綠燈進入路口，三是其他特別的案例經統整設計。 藉由高屏澎區、高雄市及台南區車鑑會之主任委員、曾任與現任委員、秘書，透過問卷相關假設情形做一調查，再根據其調查結果意見整合進行個案分析研究，探討跡證資料與科學數據於鑑定應用之情形，冀以供相關鑑定單位參考。 關鍵字：號誌路口、肇事鑑定、證人證詞、闖紅燈 Abstract According to Article 67 of the Highway Act announced in 2002, Traffic Accident Investigation Committee (TAIC) should be composed by scholars. This movement greatly improves the investigative profession of committees. Only when there is a great investigative system, can the investigation function well. However, there are still differences in arbitration among Traffic Accident Investigation Committee in difference districts. There is no standard could absolutely eliminate misconceive from judge so far. Moreover, there have been many researches about action that caused traffic accident and about evidence determination in accident scene. On the other hand, there are only a few researches about compensation and responsibility of an accident and about why the accident took place. This research collects cases that were investigated by Kaohsiung / Pingtung district、Kaohsiung City、Tainan district these three committees. It is found that these three committees make different arbitration in those cases which included witness testimony and took place at intersection with traffic lights. They take different a