- 1、本文档共12页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
counteringconfusionabouttheduluthmodel-Countering
Countering Confusion about the Duluth Model
By Michael Paymar and Graham Barnes, Research Specialists with the Battered Women’s Justice Project, a
program of Domestic Abuse Intervention Programs
Recently, the “Duluth Model” of working with men who batter has received serious criticism, despite being the
pre-eminent model internationally. Much of the criticism is based on flawed research that is contradicted by other
better-designed, more comprehensive studies. Here the authors respond directly to misinformation generated by 1)
a 2003 study from the National Institute of Justice of the U.S. Department of Justice; 2) an analysis of batterer
treatment models by Babcock, Green, and Robie (2002); and 3) unsubstantiated criticism of the philosophy
underlying the Duluth Model by Dutton and Corvo (2006). The authors, both of whom have worked with the
Domestic Abuse Intervention Project in Duluth, Minnesota, rebut inaccurate assumptions and myths about what
the model is and how it works and challenge the ethics, as well as the efficacy, of avoiding criminal justice
sanctions and relying solely on resource-intensive mental health treatments for batterers. Changing historically
entrenched battering behavior is difficult, the authors explain, but the Duluth Model prioritizes victim safety and
autonomy.
Critical Review of National Institute of Justice Research
In 2003, the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) released Batter Intervention Programs: Where Do We Go from
Here? a report suggesting that there was “no benefit from batterer counseling” and that the Duluth Model “did not
work.” Despite these claims, the NIJ researchers admit to limitations in their study, and other researchers have
roundly criticized it as seriously flawed. Nevertheless, critics of the Duluth Model have used the study to question
the effectiveness of batterer intervention programs, most specifica
文档评论(0)