工程社会稳定风险评估主体性探析.PDF

第 38 卷 第 6 期（ 总 226 期）　 　　　自 然 辩 证 法 通 讯　 　　　Vol.38, No.6 (Serial No.226) 2016 年 11 月　　　　　　　　　Journal of Dialectics of Nature　　　　　　　　　November 2016 工程社会稳定风险评估主体性探析 Subjective Analysis of Engineering Social Stability Risk Assessment 张恒力 /ZHANG Hengli （北京工业大学马克思主义学院，北京高校中国特色社会主义理论研究协同创新中心（北京工业大学），北京，100124） (College of Marxism, Beijing University of Technology; Innovation Center of Theory Study of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for Universities in Beijing(BJUT), Beijing, 100124) 摘　要：工程社会稳定风险评估已是当前工程技术风险评估的重要内容，而评估主体性问题是决定风 险评估成效的核心问题。工程职业协会以独立性、客??性和公益性特征成为最为合理的评估主体。在遵 守知情同意原则、利益和风险分配公正原则、预防原则的基础上，工程职业协会推进技术风险的识别与 沟通，促进公众对工程风险评估结果的信任和认可；利用伦理周期模型，更为细致地审查工程风险带来的 各种道德问题，达成一个多元道德反思的平衡，确定公众可以接受的工程风险，实现工程良性发展，保 障公众的安全、健康和福祉。 关键词：工程职业协会 知情同意 伦理周期 Abstract: Engineering social stability risk assessment is an important part of the current technology risk assessment, and assessment of subjectivity has become the core issue to determine the effectiveness of risk assessment. The engineering professional association has become the most reasonable evaluation subject with the characteristics of independence, objectivity and public welfare. In compliance with the informed consent principle, benefit and risk distribution justice principle and the precautionary principle, engineering professional associations promote technical risk identification and communication, and advance the public trust and approval of risk assessment; by utilizing ethical cycle model, engineering professional associations review various moral problems in more details created by the engineering risk so as to reach the balance of a wide moral reflection, make it acceptable for the public, achieve healthy development of engineering, and ensure the safety, health and welfare of the public. Key Words: Engineering Professional Association; Informed consent; Ethical