quot;人的安全quot;一种quot;还原主义quot;和quot;理想主义quot;的误导.pdfVIP

第 38 卷第 1 期 浙江大学学报{人文社会科学版} Vol. 38, No.l 2008 年 1 月 Journal of Zhejiang University( Hurnanities and Social Scien四 sJ Jan. 2008 菌际论坛:草传统安全与菌量最美翠玉辈诠前浩 人的安全:一种还原主义和 理想主义的误导 [英国]巴瑞·布赞 〈伦敦经济与政治学院国际关系学系，伦敦 WC2A 2AE) [摘 要] 人的安全概念的使用，在安全理论研究中引发了一种还原主义和理想主义的误导， 忽视了其他安全议程的道义主张和安全化的具体实践，并加剧了把安全看傲是某种可期望的终极目标的 危险。因而，人的安全作为→种分析框架，在国际安全研究中缺乏理论的价值。 [关键词〕人的安全;人权;安全化;非安全化 A Reductionist. Idealistic Notion that Adds Little Analytical Value Barry Buzan (Depaγtment of International Relatio 盯 hi 户 ， London School of Economics and Political Science , London WC2A 2AE, U. K. ) Abstract:τhe concept of human security drives towards a reductionist and idealistic understanding of international security. There is cεrtainly a case for studying the interplay between the international and domestic security agendas , but my concern is that human security aims more at collapsing them than at opening up their relationship. By attempting to collapse all the possible referent objεcts for security into a single one, human security excludes the claims of both coltective and non-human (e. g. environmental) referent objects in a way that defies both othεr moral claims and the actual practices of securitization. Finally, reconstructing human rights as human security reinforces the danger that security is taken to be the desired end. Human rights is much better placed to support the idea that the desired end is some form of desecuritization down into normal politics. Thus , as an analysis framework , human security proliferates co 丑 cepts without adding analytical value in international security studies. Key words: