- 1、本文档共18页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
我们生存的隐喻
Metaphors we live by;Experiential gestalts and the dimensions of experience.
What does it mean for a concept to fit an experience?
Metaphorical structuring versus subcategorization.
;Experiential gestalt refers to the fact that people understand or think something based on things which they have cognized.
In order to see in detail what is involved in metaphorical structuring, we must first have a clearer idea of what it means for an experience or set of experiences to be coherent by virtue of having a structure.;
The argument is war metaphor
Q: Suppose you are having a conversation and an argument. What is it that makes a conversation an argument, and what does that have to do with the war?
;1. Participants: The participants are of a certain natural kind, namely, people.
2. Parts: The parts consists of a certain natural kind of activity, namely, talking.
3. Stages: Conversations typically have a set of initial conditions and then pass through various stages, including at least a beginning, a central part, and an end.
4. Linear sequence: The participants’ turns at speaking are ordered in a linear sequence, with the general constraints that the speakers alternate.;5. Causation: The finish of one turn at talking is expected to result in the beginning of the next turn.
6. Purpose: Conversation may serve nay number of purposes, but all typical conversations share the purpose of maintaining polite social interaction in a reasonably cooperative manner.;Having a position
Has a different position
Conflict
Attack
Maneuvering
Defense
Retreat
Counterattack
Surrender
victory;
What gives coherence to this list of things that make a conversation into argument is that they correspond to elements of the concept war.
In terms of the same six dimensions of structure that we gave in our description of conversational structure.
;In terms of the same dimensions of structure, we gave conversational structure;Participants: we distinguish kinds of participants.
E.g. people, animals, ob
文档评论(0)