急性骶髂关节的损伤两种治法及疗效观察.pdf

6 Chinese J T rad M ed T raum O rthop, N ovember 2003,V o l 11, N o. 5 ·论　　著· 急性骶髂关节损伤两种治法及疗效观察 徐　飞1　侯为林2 (1. 苏州大学附属第三医院中医伤科　江苏　常州　213003; 2. 江苏省常州市中医院伤骨科) 摘要　目的: 探讨手法推拿治疗急性骶髂关节损伤的治疗及其优势。方法: 取骶髂关节损伤患者 54 例, 随 机分为手法推拿组 21 例 (治疗组); 休息、理疗和药物治疗组 33 例 (对照组)。 结果: 治疗组治愈率 71. 4% , 总 有效率 100% ; 对照组治愈率 39. 4% , 总有效率 90. 9%。两者经统计学处理有显著性差异 (P 0. 005)。结论: 手法推拿疗效优于休息、理疗和药物治疗。 关键词　骶髂关节　损伤　手法治疗 中图分类号: R 684. 7　　文献标识码: A 　　文章编号: 1005- 0205(2003) 05- 0006- 03 Two K inds of Therapeutic M ethods and Effectiveness Observa tion in Acute Sacro- iliac Jo int Injury Xu Fei, Hou W eilin D ep a rtm en t of T CM T raum a tology , S uz hou U n iversity A f f ilia ted 3rd H osp ita l. (Chang z hou , j iang su 213003) ABSTRACT　Objective: To find out the therapeuctic effectiveness and its dom inance in treating acute sacro- illiac joint injury by m aneuver. M ethods: 54 cases w ith sacro- iliac joint injury w ere divided into two group s by random , one group w as m aneuver group (therapeuctic group ) , 21cases; the o ther group (contro l group ) including rest therapy, physiotherapy and pharm aco therapy , 33cases. Results: T he curative rate in therapeutic group w as 71. 4% , to tal effective rate w as 100% ; the curative rate in contro l group w as 39. 4% , to tal effective rate w as 90. 9%. A ll of quantitative data w as analyzed statistically. T here w as significant difference betw een them (p 0. 005). Conclusion: T he therapeutic effectiveness of the m aneuver therapy