叠音词与重叠式的区别.doc

叠音词与重叠式的区别--李明国 试论汉语普通话叠音词与重叠式的区别 及其在教学中的影响 李明国 摘要：本文通过对朝鲜族《汉语文》教材与《现代汉语》教材的对比,发现朝鲜族《汉语文》教材关于单纯词与合成词的区别与《现代汉语》教材中的理论有不同。通过对不同版本资料的对比研究和从它们所举的例子中我们得出了这样的结论：朝鲜族《汉语文》教材中提到的单纯词中的叠音词“爸爸”、“妈妈”等是单纯词的观点是错误的。虽然它与中学教材中提到的合成词中的重叠式“家家”、“人人”有所不同，但是经过研究我们依然坚持大学教材中的“蝈蝈”“猩猩”等是单纯词；“爸爸”、“家家”等是合成词的观点是正确的。改正中学教材中的错误，正确引导朝鲜族生对单纯词与合成词的理解。掌握正确、科学的基础理论，从而走向更高理论水平的阶梯。关键词：叠音词；重叠式；朝鲜族；汉语文；现代汉语 On the Differences Between Reduplicative Compounds and Geminations in Chinese Standard Mandarin and the Influences in Teaching Li Mingguo Abstract: Based on the comparisons between two teaching books: the Chinese Language used by Koreans and Modern Chinese Language used in colleges, we can find that the theoretical differences about the single morpheme words and compound words of these two books. After analyzing and researching examples from various versions of materials, we can draw such a conclusion: it is a mistake to consider reduplicative compounds like “Ba Ba” (“dad” in Chinese), “Ma Ma” (“mum” in Chinese), etc. as single morpheme words in Chinese Language. Although they are different from the geminations of compound words, such as “Jia Jia” (“every family” in Chinese), “Ren Ren” (“everyone” in Chinese) and so on, mentioned in some middle school teaching materials, we still believe that words like “Guo Guo” (“katydid” in Chinese) or “Xing Xing” (“gorilla” in Chinese) are single morpheme words, and “Ba Ba”, “Jia Jia”, etc., are compound words, which are actually correct viewpoints in the college teaching book. As a result, we should correct these mistakes in teaching materials, and try to provide a right understanding about single morpheme words and compound words for Korean middle-school students. As long as we have correct and scientific fundamental theories, we can step up to a higher theoretical level.Key words:reduplicative compounds; gemination; Korean; Chinese language; Modern Chinese我们在大学中文系汉语言文学专业学习，对汉语理论有了更深的了解。发现在朝鲜族汉语文教材中所学的理论与大学教材所讲的理论有所不同。即单纯词与合成词的界限问题。如何解释单纯词与合成词，哪个区分