- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2016VCEEnglishexaminationreport.PDF
2016 VCE English examination report
General comments
The 2016 English examination assessed student achievement in the skills and outcomes indicated
in the final year of the VCE English Study Design 2006–2016.
It was evident that the majority of students had a clear understanding of the requirements of the
examination and how to approach each section. While there were some weaknesses and faults,
students generally performed well.
The examination consisted of three sections. The first section (Text response) offered students the
choice of two distinct topics for each of the 20 texts on the text list published by the VCAA.
Students were required to respond to one topic on one text. The second section (Writing in
Context) instructed students to compose a piece of writing stemming from a prompt for each of the
four Contexts. Section C (Analysis of language use) required students to analyse the ways in
which written and visual language were used to attempt to persuade readers about an issue in a
local newspaper.
Assessment was based on criteria, which were applied holistically. Scores were awarded that
reflected the assessors’ judgment of the whole answer on balance, and students were ranked over
the full normative range of available marks. The descriptors used for assessment are based on the
criteria and are general indicators of what might reasonably be expected for the specified mark
ranges in each section of the examination. Fine judgments are then made when the exact
characteristics of responses for any one year are analysed.
More than 40 000 students sat for the 2016 English examination, and the skills and qualities shown
by the majority of students were impressive. Most were able to respond well and present three
completed pieces of writing that demonstrated an understanding of the knowledge and skills
required in the study. Both the quality and quantity of work produced under the timed conditions of
the examination were quite sound and, at
文档评论(0)